DSS Technology Management, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 353

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 352 Stipulation Re Cross-Motion to Strike Briefing Schedule and Hearing Date. Motions due by 12/5/2019; Responses due by 12/12/2019 and Motion Hearing set for 12/19/2019 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2019)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

MARK FOWLER (Bar No. 124235)
[e-mail]
CLAYTON THOMPSON (Bar No. 291331)
[e-mail]
YAKOV M. ZOLOTOREV (Bar No. 224260)
[e-mail]
SUMMER TORREZ (Bar No. 264858)
[e-mail]
JONATHAN HICKS (Bar No. 274634)
[e-mail]
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
2000 University Avenue
East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
ERIN P. GIBSON (Bar No. 229305)
[e-mail]
PETER MAGGIORE (Bar No. 292534)
[e-mail]
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
401 B Street, Suite 1700
San Diego, CA 92101-4297
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19
20

DSS TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT,
INC.,

21

JOINT STIPULATION AND
ORDER REGARDING CROSSMOTION TO STRIKE BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE

Plaintiff,

22

v.

23

CASE NO. 14-cv-05330 HSG

APPLE INC.,

24

Defendant.

25
26
27
28
DLA P I PER LLP (US)
EAST PAL O AL TO

WEST\288481017.1

-1JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO STRIKE HEARING
CASE NO. 14-CV-05330 (HSG)

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, 7-1(a)(5), and 7-12, Plaintiff DSS Technology

2

Management, Inc. (“DSS”) and Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”), through their respective counsel

3

of record, hereby stipulate as follows regarding Apple’s upcoming cross-motion to strike:

4
5

WHEREAS, on January 16, 2019, the Court entered a Scheduling Order setting the
Dispositive Motion Hearing Deadline for October 31, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. (Dkt. 183);

6

WHEREAS, on August 1, 2019, the Court entered an order resetting the Dispositive

7

Motion Hearing Deadline from October 31, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. to December 19, 2019 at 2:00 p.m.;

8
9

WHEREAS, on August 9, 2019, the parties submitted a stipulation (Dkt. 238) to extend
the briefing schedule for the Dispositive and Daubert Motions, as follows:

10

EVENT

11

DEADLINE

Deadline for Dispositive Motions and
Daubert Motions
Opposition to Dispositive Motions and
Daubert Motions

13
14
15

November 14, 2019

Replies in Support of Dispositive
Motions and Daubert Motions

12

October 17, 2019

December 5, 2019

16

WHEREAS, on August 9, 2019, the Court granted the parties’ stipulation (Dkt. 239);

17

WHEREAS, on October 17, 2019, the parties filed Dispositive Motions and Daubert

18

Motions (Dkts. 258, 264, 265, 268);
WHEREAS, on October 17, 2019, each of the parties also filed a Motion to Strike certain

19
20

expert testimony (Dkts. 263, 270);
WHEREAS, on October 25, 2019, the parties submitted a stipulation (Dkt. 296) agreeing

21
22

to the same briefing schedule for the Motions to Strike as the Dispositive and Daubert Motions,

23

as well as the following briefing schedule for DSS’ Second Motion to Strike portions of

24

Dr. Fuja’s expert report regarding the claimed “server microcomputer” limitation as it relates to

25

the priority date of the Patent-in-Suit:

26

///

27

///

28

///

DLA P I PER LLP (US)
EAST PAL O AL TO

WEST\288481017.1

-2JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO STRIKE HEARING
CASE NO. 14-CV-05330 (HSG)

1

EVENT

DEADLINE

2

Opposition to DSS’ Motion to Strike

December 5, 2019

3

Reply in Support of DSS’ Motion to
Strike

December 12, 2019

4
5

WHEREAS, on October 31, 2019, the Court granted the parties’ stipulation (Dkt. 304);

6

WHEREAS, on November 14, 2019, DSS filed an Opposition to Apple’s Motion for

7

Summary Judgment (Dkt. 315) and a Second Motion to Strike portions of Dr. Fuja’s expert report

8

regarding the claimed “server microcomputer” limitation as it relates to the priority date of the

9

Patent-in-Suit (Dkt. 329);

10

WHEREAS, DSS submitted a declaration from Mr. Denning in support of DSS’

11

Opposition to Apple’s Motion for Summary Judgment and a Second Motion to Strike portions of

12

Dr. Fuja’s expert report regarding the claimed “server microcomputer” limitation as it relates to

13

the priority date of the Patent-in-Suit (Dkt. 320);

14

WHEREAS, Apple intends to file a cross-motion to strike the declaration of Mr. Denning

15

(Dkt. 320) regarding the claimed “server microcomputer” limitation as it relates to the priority

16

date of the Patent-in-Suit, on December 5, 2019 (“Upcoming Cross-Motion to Strike”);

17
18

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to the following briefing schedule for Apple’s
Upcoming Cross-Motion to Strike:

19
20
21
22

EVENT

DEADLINE

Opposition to Apple’s Upcoming
Cross-Motion to Strike

December 12, 2019

Reply in Support of Apple’s Upcoming
Cross-Motion to Strike

No written reply

23
24

WHEREAS, the Parties submit this briefing schedule so that, in the interest of efficiency,

25

the Court may hear Apple’s Upcoming Cross-Motion to Strike at the December 19, 2019 hearing

26

on the Dispositive and Daubert Motions; and

27
28
DLA P I PER LLP (US)
EAST PAL O AL TO

WEST\288481017.1

-3JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO STRIKE HEARING
CASE NO. 14-CV-05330 (HSG)

1

WHEREAS, the briefing schedule and the December 19, 2019 hearing date for the

2

Upcoming Cross-Motion to Strike will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already set

3

by this Court in this case.

4

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

5
6
7

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), concurrence to the filing of this document was obtained
from Niky Bagley, counsel for DSS Technology Management, Inc., on November 21, 2019.

8
9

Dated: November 21, 2019

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

10
By /s/ Summer Torrez
MARK D. FOWLER
CLAYTON THOMPSON
YAKOV M. ZOLOTOREV
ERIN P. GIBSON
SUMMER TORREZ
JONATHAN HICKS
PETER MAGGIORE

11
12
13
14
15

Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

16
17

BUETHER JOE & CARPENTER, LLC

18
19

By /s/ Niky Bagley
CHRISTOPHER M. JOE
ERIC W. BUETHER
BRIAN A. CARPENTER
NIKY BAGLEY
KENNETH KULA

20
21
22

Attorneys for Plaintiff
DSS Technology Management, Inc.

23
24
25
26
27
28
DLA P I PER LLP (US)
EAST PAL O AL TO

WEST\288481017.1

-4JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO STRIKE HEARING
CASE NO. 14-CV-05330 (HSG)

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

2
3

Dated: 11/22/2019
By
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DLA P I PER LLP (US)
EAST PAL O AL TO

WEST\288481017.1

-5JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO STRIKE HEARING
CASE NO. 14-CV-05330 (HSG)