Adams v. City of Hayward et al

Filing 169

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; Order Continuing Hearing Date re 161 Motion for Attorney's Fees to 4/20/2017 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Show Cause Response due by 3/17/2017. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 3/10/2017. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TERRI ADAMS, Plaintiff, 8 CITY OF HAYWARD, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 161 Defendants. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE v. 9 10 Case No. 14-cv-05482-KAW 12 On February 21, 2017, Defendant Tina Mills filed a motion for attorney's fees, set for 13 hearing on April 6, 2017. (Dkt. No. 161.) Plaintiff's response was due by March 7, 2017. As of 14 the filing of this order, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition. Therefore, Plaintiff is ordered, on or 15 before March 17, 2017, to 1) file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendant's 16 motion for attorney's fees, and 2) respond to this order to show cause by explaining why she did 17 not file a timely opposition. Failure to complete both tasks by March 17, 2017 may result in the 18 Court granting Defendant's motion pursuant to Paragraph 22 of this Court's Standing Order, which 19 states that "[t]he failure of the opp osing party to file a memorandum of points and authorities in 20 opposition to any motion shall constitute consent to the granting of the motion." Defendant's reply 21 deadline is continued to seven days after Plaintiff files her opposition. 22 Additionally, because April 6, 2017 is not an available hearing date, the Court 23 CONTINUES the hearing on Defendant's motion for attorney's fees to April 20, 2017 at 11:00 24 a.m. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 10, 2017 __________________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?