Coleman v. California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 20

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 19 Motion for Extension of Time to File Second Amended Complaint. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2016)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 DWIGHT A. COLEMAN, Case No. 14-cv-05508-YGR (PR) Plaintiffs, 5 v. 6 7 JEFFREY BEARD, et al., Defendants. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 8 9 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se prisoner complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court initially dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend. On July 20, 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 2015, Plaintiff filed his amended complaint. On January 12, 2016, the Court issued an Order 12 dismissing Plaintiff’s amended complaint with leave to amend. The Court directed Plaintiff to file 13 his second amended complaint within twenty-eight days of the January 12, 2016 Order. That 14 deadline has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed his second amended complaint. 15 16 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file his second amended complaint. 17 Good cause appearing, the request is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his second amended 18 complaint no later than April 15, 2016. He must clearly label the document a “Second Amended 19 Complaint,” and write in the case number for this action, Case No. C 14-5508 YGR (PR). 20 Plaintiff’s failure to file his second amended complaint by the April 15, 2016 deadline will result 21 in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. No further extensions of time will be granted 22 absent extraordinary circumstances. 23 This Order terminates Docket No. 19. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: February 18, 2016 ______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?