Coleman v. California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Filing
20
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 19 Motion for Extension of Time to File Second Amended Complaint. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2016)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
DWIGHT A. COLEMAN,
Case No. 14-cv-05508-YGR (PR)
Plaintiffs,
5
v.
6
7
JEFFREY BEARD, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO FILE SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
8
9
Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se prisoner complaint under 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983. The Court initially dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend. On July 20,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
2015, Plaintiff filed his amended complaint. On January 12, 2016, the Court issued an Order
12
dismissing Plaintiff’s amended complaint with leave to amend. The Court directed Plaintiff to file
13
his second amended complaint within twenty-eight days of the January 12, 2016 Order. That
14
deadline has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed his second amended complaint.
15
16
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file his second amended
complaint.
17
Good cause appearing, the request is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his second amended
18
complaint no later than April 15, 2016. He must clearly label the document a “Second Amended
19
Complaint,” and write in the case number for this action, Case No. C 14-5508 YGR (PR).
20
Plaintiff’s failure to file his second amended complaint by the April 15, 2016 deadline will result
21
in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. No further extensions of time will be granted
22
absent extraordinary circumstances.
23
This Order terminates Docket No. 19.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: February 18, 2016
______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
United States District Court Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?