Castaneda v. Colvin

Filing 10

ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff to Inform Court Regarding Consent to Magistrate Judge for All Purposes. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on January 21, 2015. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2015)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8

ROSADA CASTANEDA,

9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Plaintiff,

No. C 14-05515 JSW

v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of
Social Security,

12
Defendant.
13

/

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF
TO INFORM COURT
REGARDING CONSENT TO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL
PURPOSES

14
In cases initially assigned to a district judge, the parties may consent at any time to
15
reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including entry of final
16
judgment. See Civil L.R. 73-1(b). The Court has received notice of such consent from
17
Defendant. Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby DIRECTED to advise the Court, no later than
18
February 6, 2015, as to whether she consents to have a magistrate judge conduct all further
19
proceedings in the instant action. For the parties’ convenience, consent forms are available at
20

http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, in the “Forms” section.1 The parties are further advised that they

21
may jointly request assignment to a specific magistrate judge.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
Dated: January 21, 2015
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
28

Normally, the Court would direct the parties to so inform the Court in their joint
case management statement filed in connection with a case management conference.
Because the instant action involves a review of an administrative record, however, a case
management conference has not been scheduled.
1