Da Silva v. Consulate General of Brazil in San Francisco
Filing
24
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 1/6/2017. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2017)
1
2
3
4
CARY KLETTER, Bar No. 210230
ckletter@kletterlaw.com
SALLY TRUNG NGUYEN, Bar No. 267275
snguyen@kletterlaw.com
KLETTER + NGUYEN LAW LLP
1900 S. Norfolk Street, Suite 350
San Mateo, CA 94403
Telephone:650.577.2336
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOAO LUIZ DA SILVA
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
Case No. 14-cv-05528 DMR
JOAO LUIZ DA SILVA
11
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
PLAINTIFF,
12
13
14
15
16
v.
CONSULATE GENERAL OF BRAZIL
IN SAN FRANCISCO and DOES 1 - 20,
inclusive,
DEFENDANTS.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
1
Plaintiff Joao Luiz Da Silva (“Plaintiff”), by and through his undersigned counsel,
2
respectfully requests this Court dismiss all claims asserted in the above-captioned action pursuant to
3
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) Rule 41(a)(2). Such dismissal shall be without
4
prejudice, with each of the parties is to bear its/his own attorney’s fees and costs.
5
6
Dated: January 5, 2017
KLETTER + NGUYEN LAW LLP
7
By: ___/S/ SALLY TRUNG NGUYEN
Cary Kletter
Sally Trung Nguyen
Attorneys for PLAINTIFF
JOAO LUIZ DA SILVA
8
9
10
11
12
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Based upon Plaintiff’s request for dismissal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2), the above-captioned action is dismissed without prejudice; and
14
2. Each of the parties is to bear its/his own costs attorney’s fees and costs.
H
ER
M. Ryu
21
22
R NIA
onna
Judge D
FO
RT
20
NO
19
O ORD
IT IS S
LI
18
HONORABLE DONNA M. RYU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT ED
ER COURT JUDGE
A
17
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Jan. 6, 2017
Dated: _______________
UNIT
ED
15
S
13
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
23
24
25
26
27
28
2.
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?