Da Silva v. Consulate General of Brazil in San Francisco

Filing 24

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 1/6/2017. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 CARY KLETTER, Bar No. 210230 ckletter@kletterlaw.com SALLY TRUNG NGUYEN, Bar No. 267275 snguyen@kletterlaw.com KLETTER + NGUYEN LAW LLP 1900 S. Norfolk Street, Suite 350 San Mateo, CA 94403 Telephone:650.577.2336 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff JOAO LUIZ DA SILVA 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 Case No. 14-cv-05528 DMR JOAO LUIZ DA SILVA 11 REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF, 12 13 14 15 16 v. CONSULATE GENERAL OF BRAZIL IN SAN FRANCISCO and DOES 1 - 20, inclusive, DEFENDANTS. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 1 Plaintiff Joao Luiz Da Silva (“Plaintiff”), by and through his undersigned counsel, 2 respectfully requests this Court dismiss all claims asserted in the above-captioned action pursuant to 3 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) Rule 41(a)(2). Such dismissal shall be without 4 prejudice, with each of the parties is to bear its/his own attorney’s fees and costs. 5 6 Dated: January 5, 2017 KLETTER + NGUYEN LAW LLP 7 By: ___/S/ SALLY TRUNG NGUYEN Cary Kletter Sally Trung Nguyen Attorneys for PLAINTIFF JOAO LUIZ DA SILVA 8 9 10 11 12 [PROPOSED] ORDER Based upon Plaintiff’s request for dismissal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2), the above-captioned action is dismissed without prejudice; and 14 2. Each of the parties is to bear its/his own costs attorney’s fees and costs. H ER M. Ryu 21 22 R NIA onna Judge D FO RT 20 NO 19 O ORD IT IS S LI 18 HONORABLE DONNA M. RYU UNITED STATES DISTRICT ED ER COURT JUDGE A 17 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. Jan. 6, 2017 Dated: _______________ UNIT ED 15 S 13 N F D IS T IC T O R 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?