Turner v. Lewis et al
Filing
138
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 137 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re Stipulated Request for Special Status Conference filed by Montanez, Lafonzo R. Turner, Love. Status Conference set for 6/5/2018 10:00 AM in McKinleyville before Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman. Signed by Judge Robert M. Illman on 5/31/2018. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Wayne O. Stacy (SBN: 314579)
Sarah J. Guske (SBN: 232467)
Ariel D. House (SBN: 280477)
BAKER BOTTS LLP
101 California Street, Suite 3600
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 291-6200
Facsimile: (415) 291-6300
William C. Kwong, (SBN: 168010)
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
455 Golden Gate Ave., Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94120
Telephone: (415) 510-3583
Facsimile: (415) 703-5843
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LAFONZO R. TURNER
Attorneys for Defendants
M. CATES and G. LEWIS
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
LAFONZO R. TURNER
Case No. 15-cv-03067-KAW
v.
M. Cates, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
19
LAFONZO R. TURNER
Case No. 15-cv-00078-KAW
v.
G. Lewis, et al.,
[PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING
TELEPHONIC STATUS
CONFERENCE
Defendant.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC
STATUS CONFERENCE
CASE NOS. 15-cv-78 & 15-cv-3067
1
2
The Court has reviewed and considered Plaintiff Lafonzo Turner’s (“Plaintiff”) request
for telephonic status conference, and hereby GRANTS the request.
3
The Court hereby orders the parties to participate in a telephonic status conference on
4
888-684-8852
June 5
_____________, 2018, at 10:00 AM Parties may appear by dialing __________________,
_______.
5
1868782
access code________________.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED
7
8
May 31,
Dated: __________ 2018
________________________
The Hon. Robert M. Illman
United States Magistrate Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC
STATUS CONFERENCE
1
CASE NOS. 15-cv-78 & 15-cv-3067
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?