Wellman v. Oplink Communications, Inc. et al

Filing 31

ORDER GRANTING 29 STIPULATION Selecting Private ADR. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 3/30/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2015)

Case4:15-cv-00156-JSW Document29 Filed03/27/15 Page1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN WELLMAN,

CASE NO. 4:15-cv-00156-JSW
Plaintiff,

v.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS, et al.,
Defendants.
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
☐
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
☐
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
☐
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
☒
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) The parties have

discussed early private mediation, and continue to meet and confer
regarding selection of a mediator and a mediation date.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
☐
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
☒

other requested deadline July 31, 2015

Dated: March 27, 2015

/s/ Michael L. Tracy
Attorney for Plaintiff
Kevin Wellman

Dated: March 27, 2015

/s/ Arthur M. Eidelhoch
Attorney for Defendant
Oplink Communications, Inc.

Dated: March 27, 2015

/s/ Daniel A. Croley
Attorney for Defendant Joe Liu

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

Case4:15-cv-00156-JSW Document29 Filed03/27/15 Page2 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
X
☐
☐

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 30, 2015

__________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2