Wellman v. Oplink Communications, Inc. et al

Filing 35

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 4/24/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

KEVIN WELLMAN,

Case No. 15-cv-00156-JSW

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND
PRETRIAL MATTERS

9
OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et
al.,

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

Defendants.

12
13

Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case

14

Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further

15

ORDERED that:

16

A.

DATES

17

Jury Trial Date: June 13, 2016,, at 8:00 a.m., 6 day estimate

18

Jury Selection: June 8, 2016 at 8:00 a.m.

19

Pretrial Conference: May 2, 2016, at 2:00 p.m.

20

Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: Friday, April 1, 2016, 9:00 A.M.

21

Last Day for Expert Discovery: May 2, 2016

22

Last Day for Expert Disclosure: March 31, 2016

23

Close of Non-expert Discovery: February 1, 2016

24

B.

DISCOVERY

25

The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to

26

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses

27

pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of non-

28

expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all

1
supplementation has been completed.
2
C.

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

3
By agreement of the parties, this matter is referred to private ADR, to be completed by
4
July 31, 2015. The parties shall promptly notify the Court whether the case is resolved.
5
D.

PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER

6
No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its
7
own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b)
8
without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline
9
contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties may
10
not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the date of
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to a change
12
in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule that the Court
13
will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are specifically set
14
by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain leave of Court.
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
Dated: April 24, 2015
18
19
20

______________________________________
JEFFREY S. WHITE
United States District Judge

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2