Castellanos et al v. State of California et al

Filing 13

ORDER Continuing Initial Case Management Conference. Supplemental Case Management Statement due by 5/15/2015. Case Management Conference set for 5/22/2015 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on April 17, 2015. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

EDIN S. CASTELLANOS,
No. C 15-00272 JSW

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

Plaintiff,
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
Defendant.
/

14
15

The Court has received the parties’ joint case management conference statement. With

16

respect to the discovery disputes outlined on pages 12:23-13:14, the Court does not resolve such

17

issues in the context of a case management conference. If the parties cannot resolve these

18

disputes, they shall submit a joint letter brief in accordance with the Court’s Standing Order

19

regarding discovery disputes. (See Civil Standing Orders ¶ 8.)

20

Although the parties have stated that they “defer to the court’s recommendation and

21

availability for completion of discovery and trial deadlines,” the Court requires the parties’

22

input. Accordingly, the Court CONTINUES the case management conference set for April 24,

23

2015, to May 22, 2015 at 11:00 a.m.

24

The parties shall meet and confer and shall submit a supplemental case management

25

conference statement by May 15, 2015, which includes proposed deadlines for discovery (fact

26

and expert) cut-off, expert disclosures (including rebuttal), the deadline to hear dispositive

27

motions, pretrial and trial. The Court HEREBY REFERS the parties to its Guidelines for Civil

28

Jury Trials, which will provide the parties with information regarding the deadlines and

1

filing requirements associated with the pretrial conference, including deadlines by which

2

motions in limine are to be exchanged and subsequently filed.

3
4
5

If the parties are not able to agree to a schedule, they shall submit their competing
proposals with a brief explanation as to why that schedule should be adopted.
Finally, the Court refers the parties to the Northern District’s Guidelines for Professional

6

Conduct, which can be found on the Court’s website. The parties shall certify that they have

7

reviewed these guidelines, when they submit the supplemental case management statement

8

required by this Order. (See N.D. Joint Case Management Statement, ¶ 20.)

9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
Dated: April 17, 2015
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2