Edd King et al v. National General Insurance Company et al

Filing 46

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 45 Stipulation.(dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2015)

Case4:15-cv-00313-DMR Document45 Filed05/06/15 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Jeffrey B. Cereghino, SBN 099480
Email: [e-mail]
Michael F. Ram, SBN 104805
Email: [e-mail]
Susan Brown, SBN 287986
Email: [e-mail]
Matt Malone, SBN 221545
Email: [e-mail]
RAM, OLSON, CEREGHINO
& KOPCZYNSKI LLP
555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Proposed Class

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13

EDD KING, DIEDRE KING, and ELMO
SHEEN, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated,

14
15

Plaintiff,
v.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE
COMPANY, NATIONAL GENERAL
ASSURANCE COMPANY, INTEGON
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
INTEGON PREFERRED INSURANCE
COMPANY, MIC GENERAL INSURANCE
CORPORATION, PERSONAL EXPRESS
INSURANCE COMPANY, SECURITY
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
SEQUOIA INSURANCE COMPANY,
and DOES1 through 200, inclusive,

Case No. 4:15cv00313-DMR
STIPULATION REGARDING
PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSES TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
STRIKE PORTIONS OF AND
MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendants.

24
25
26
27
CASE NO. 4:15cv00313-DMR – STIPULATION RE MOTION TO DISMISS AND
MOTION TO STRIKE OPPOSITION DATE

1

Case4:15-cv-00313-DMR Document45 Filed05/06/15 Page2 of 2

1

The parties, by their counsel, STIPULATE that Plaintiff shall have one additional week

2

to file their response to Defendants’ motion to strike portions of and motion to dismiss

3

Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, to and including May 15, 2015, provided that the Court

4

does not reschedule the currently scheduled motion/CMC hearing on, currently scheduled for

5

June 11, 2015. Defendants’ agreement as set forth above is conditioned on the Court not

6

moving said date in light of the additional week extension agreed to by Defendants.

7
8

Date: May 6, 2015

By: /s/ Jeffrey B. Cereghino
Attorney for Plaintiffs and Proposed Class

Date: May 6, 2015

By: /s/ Todd H. Stitt
Attorney for Defendants

9
10
11
12
13
14
15

ORDER

16
17

Good cause appearing, the Court agrees that Plaintiffs’ opposing brief(s) to Defendants’

18

motion to strike portions of and motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint shall be

19

due on May 15, 2015. All scheduled court dates/hearings remain the same.

20

Defendants' reply shall be due on May 22, 2015.

21
22

May 6, 2015

Dated: _______

___________________________________
Hon. Judge Donna M. Ryu

23
24
25
26
27
CASE NO. 4:15cv00313-DMR – STIPULATION RE MOTION TO DISMISS AND
MOTION TO STRIKE OPPOSITION DATE

2