Tucker Durnford v. MusclePharm Corp.

Filing 78

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 77 (Unopposed) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney of Mary B. Reiten.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Michael F. Ram, CSB #104805 Email: mram@robinskaplan.com Susan S. Brown, CSB #287986 Email: sbrown@robinskaplan.com ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 2440 West El Camino Real, Suite 100 Mountain View, California 94040 Telephone: (650) 784-4040 Facsimile: (650) 784-4041 [Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page] 7 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 9 10 11 12 TUCKER DURNFORD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Plaintiff, v. MUSCLEPHARM CORP., NO. 4:15-cv-00413-HSG ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO PERMIT WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL JURY TRIAL DEMAND Defendant. Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DATE: TIME: LOCATION: Courtroom 2 – 4th Floor Having reviewed and considered Plaintiff Tucker Durnford’s ("Plaintiff") Unopposed Motion to Permit Withdrawal of Counsel, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby orders that Mary B. Reiten of Terrell Marshall Law Group PLLC be permitted to withdraw as counsel of record for Plaintiff. Beth E. Terrell of Terrell Marshall Law Group PLLC, Michael F. Ram and Susan S. Brown of Robins Kaplan LLP, and Jeffrey Cereghino and Matt J. Malone of 26 27 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO PERMIT WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL - 1 CASE NO. 4:15-CV-00413-HSG 1 Cereghino Law Group will continue as counsel of record Plaintiff. The Court's ECF system shall 2 be updated to reflect these changes. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: February 7, 2019 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO PERMIT WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL - 2 CASE NO. 4:15-CV-00413-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?