Tucker Durnford v. MusclePharm Corp.
Filing
78
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 77 (Unopposed) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney of Mary B. Reiten.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2019)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Michael F. Ram, CSB #104805
Email: mram@robinskaplan.com
Susan S. Brown, CSB #287986
Email: sbrown@robinskaplan.com
ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
2440 West El Camino Real, Suite 100
Mountain View, California 94040
Telephone: (650) 784-4040
Facsimile: (650) 784-4041
[Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page]
7
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
9
10
11
12
TUCKER DURNFORD, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Plaintiff,
v.
MUSCLEPHARM CORP.,
NO. 4:15-cv-00413-HSG
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO PERMIT
WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL
JURY TRIAL DEMAND
Defendant.
Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
DATE:
TIME:
LOCATION: Courtroom 2 – 4th Floor
Having reviewed and considered Plaintiff Tucker Durnford’s ("Plaintiff") Unopposed
Motion to Permit Withdrawal of Counsel, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby orders
that Mary B. Reiten of Terrell Marshall Law Group PLLC be permitted to withdraw as counsel
of record for Plaintiff. Beth E. Terrell of Terrell Marshall Law Group PLLC, Michael F. Ram
and Susan S. Brown of Robins Kaplan LLP, and Jeffrey Cereghino and Matt J. Malone of
26
27
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED
MOTION TO PERMIT WITHDRAWAL OF
COUNSEL - 1
CASE NO. 4:15-CV-00413-HSG
1
Cereghino Law Group will continue as counsel of record Plaintiff. The Court's ECF system shall
2
be updated to reflect these changes.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: February 7, 2019
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED
MOTION TO PERMIT WITHDRAWAL OF
COUNSEL - 2
CASE NO. 4:15-CV-00413-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?