Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Aerotek, Inc.

Filing 31

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 12/14/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DIVISION OF LABOR STANDARDS ENFORCEMENT, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS 9 v. 10 AEROTEK, INC., Defendant. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 4:15-cv-00428-JSW 12 13 Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case 14 Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further 15 ORDERED that: 16 A. DATES 17 Jury Trial Date: Monday, September 19, 2016, at 8:00 a.m., 5 days 18 Jury Selection: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 8:00 a.m. 19 Pretrial Conference: Monday, August 29, 2016, at 2:00 p.m. 20 Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: Friday, June 17, 2016, 9:00 A.M. 21 Last Day for Expert Discovery: July 29, 2016 22 Last Day for Expert Disclosure: 6-3-16 23 Last Day for Rebuttal Expert Disclosure: July 1, 2016 24 Close of Non-expert Discovery: April 1, 2016 25 B. DISCOVERY 26 The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to 27 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses 28 pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of non- 1 expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all 2 supplementation has been completed. 3 C. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 4 This matter is referred to court-connected mediation, to be completed by 2-29-16. The 5 parties shall promptly notify the Court whether the case is resolved at the mediation. 6 D. PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER 7 No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its 8 own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b) 9 without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline 10 contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties may 11 United States District Court Northern District of California not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the date of 12 this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to a change 13 in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule that the Court 14 will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are specifically set 15 by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain leave of Court. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 Dated: December 14, 2015 19 20 21 ______________________________________ JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?