Takiah Mignon Stroman v. Carolyn w Colvin
Filing
19
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting as unopposed 16 Motion for Summary Judgment and Remanding for further administrative proceedings before a different ALJ. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2015) Modified on 8/3/2015 (kawlc1, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
TAKIAH MIGNON STROMAN,
Case No. 15-cv-00633-KAW
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
CAROLYN W COLVIN,
Defendant.
Re: Dkt. No. 16
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AS UNOPPOSED AND REMANDING
THE CASE FOR FURTHER
PROCEEDINGS
12
13
On June 23, 2015, Plaintiff Takiah Mignon Stroman filed a motion for summary judgment
14
in her social security case. The Government’s opposition was due on or before July 21, 2015. To
15
date, the Government has not filed an opposition despite its communication with Plaintiff’s
16
counsel. (See Dkt. No. 18-1.)
17
Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as unopposed and the case
18
is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings before a different administrative law judge.
19
See Judge Westmore’s General Standing Order ¶ 22 (“The failure of the opposing party to file a
20
memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to any motion shall constitute consent to the
21
granting of the motion”). Specifically, the further proceedings shall include making a new
22
determination regarding Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity, shall address the weight given to
23
Plaintiff’s treating physicians, and shall address Plaintiff’s credibility prior to determining whether
24
Plaintiff is disabled under the Social Security Act.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 3, 2015
__________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?