Takiah Mignon Stroman v. Carolyn w Colvin
Filing
25
ORDER Setting Hearing on Defendant's 22 MOTION for Relief Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) set for 12/3/2015 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. ORDER Setting Hearing on Plaintiff's 24 First MOTION for Attorney Fees set for 12/17/2015 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 11/4/2015. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
TAKIAH MIGNON STROMAN,
Case No. 15-cv-00633-KAW
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
CAROLYN W COLVIN,
Defendant.
ORDER SETTING HEARINGS ON
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RELIEF
UNDER RULE 60 AND PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES
Re: Dkt. Nos. 22 & 24
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
On October 9, 2015, the Government filed a motion for administrative relief under Federal
13
14
Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1) on the grounds that its failure to file a timely opposition to
15
Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment was due to attorney Brenda M. Pullin’s excusable
16
neglect. On October 16, 2015, Plaintiff filed an opposition. (Dkt. No. 23.) The Government did
17
not file a reply by the October 30, 2015 deadline, so the motion is fully briefed. Accordingly, the
18
Court will hold a hearing on the Government’s motion on December 3, 2015 at 11:00 AM at 1301
19
Clay Street, Oakland, California. Both Ms. Pullin and her supervising attorney are ordered to
20
appear.
21
On October 27, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion for attorneys’ fees pursuant to the Equal
22
Access to Justice Act. (Dkt. No. 24.) The Court will hold a hearing on Plaintiff’s motion on
23
December 17, 2015 at 11:00 AM at 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 4, 2015
__________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?