Van Kempen v. Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.

Filing 85

JOINT JUDGMENT APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. ***Civil Case Terminated.*** Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 9/5/2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

S. BRETT SUTTON 143107
[e-mail]
JARED HAGUE 251517
[e-mail]
JOSEPH V. MACIAS 273168
[e-mail]
SUTTON HAGUE LAW CORPORATION
5200 N. Palm Avenue, Suite 203
Fresno, California 93704
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff:
Roy Van Kempen and the Settlement Class

9
10
11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16

***
ROY VAN KEMPEN, an individual, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated,

Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

17
18
19
20

Case No. 4:15-cv-00660-HSG

Plaintiff,
CLASS ACTION
vs.
MATHESON TRI-GAS, INC., a Delaware
Corporation; and Does 1 through 50, inclusive,

JOINT [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
APPROVING CLASS ACTION
SETTLEMENT

21
22

Defendants.
Complaint Filed: January 12, 2015

23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

1

This matter coming before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Approval of Joint Stipulation

2

of Class Settlement (the “Final Approval Motion”), and after review and consideration of the parties’

3

fully-executed Joint Stipulation of Class Settlement (“Settlement”), the papers in support of the Final

4

Approval Motion, Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs and Enhancement Award, having heard

5

the arguments of counsel during hearing on August 3, 2017 at which no objectors appeared, and the

6

Court having issued an Order Granting Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and

7

Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs on August 25, 2017 (the “Final Approval Order”) (ECF No. 83),

8

and good cause appearing therefore,

9
10
11

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
1.

Final judgment in this matter is hereby entered in conformity with the terms of the

Settlement and the Final Approval Order;

12

2.

This case is hereby dismissed with prejudice;

13

3.

Without affecting the finality of this Final Judgment in any way, this Court retains

14

continuing jurisdiction over the implementation, interpretation, and enforcement of the Joint Stipulation

15

of Class Action Settlement with respect to all Parties to this action, and their counsel of record.

16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED

18
19

DATED: _____________________
9/5/2017

________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
JOINT [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT