Van Kempen v. Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.

Filing 85

JOINT JUDGMENT APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. ***Civil Case Terminated.*** Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 9/5/2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 S. BRETT SUTTON 143107 JARED HAGUE 251517 JOSEPH V. MACIAS 273168 SUTTON HAGUE LAW CORPORATION 5200 N. Palm Avenue, Suite 203 Fresno, California 93704 Telephone: (559) 325-0500 Facsimile: (559) 981-1217 Attorneys for Plaintiff: Roy Van Kempen and the Settlement Class 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 *** ROY VAN KEMPEN, an individual, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 17 18 19 20 Case No. 4:15-cv-00660-HSG Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION vs. MATHESON TRI-GAS, INC., a Delaware Corporation; and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, JOINT [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 21 22 Defendants. Complaint Filed: January 12, 2015 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 1 This matter coming before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Approval of Joint Stipulation 2 of Class Settlement (the “Final Approval Motion”), and after review and consideration of the parties’ 3 fully-executed Joint Stipulation of Class Settlement (“Settlement”), the papers in support of the Final 4 Approval Motion, Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs and Enhancement Award, having heard 5 the arguments of counsel during hearing on August 3, 2017 at which no objectors appeared, and the 6 Court having issued an Order Granting Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and 7 Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs on August 25, 2017 (the “Final Approval Order”) (ECF No. 83), 8 and good cause appearing therefore, 9 10 11 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. Final judgment in this matter is hereby entered in conformity with the terms of the Settlement and the Final Approval Order; 12 2. This case is hereby dismissed with prejudice; 13 3. Without affecting the finality of this Final Judgment in any way, this Court retains 14 continuing jurisdiction over the implementation, interpretation, and enforcement of the Joint Stipulation 15 of Class Action Settlement with respect to all Parties to this action, and their counsel of record. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED 18 19 DATED: _____________________ 9/5/2017 ________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 JOINT [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?