Ostrowski v. NVIDIA Corporation et al
Filing
125
ORDER re 124 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER, VACATING SCHEDULE REGARDING DEFENDANTS' 114 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 06/14/2016. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
Case No. 15-cv-00760-PJH
8
IN RE: NVIDIA GTX 970 GRAPHICS
CHIP LITIGATION
9
This document relates to:
ORDER VACATING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS
10
ALL ACTIONS
Re: Dkt. Nos. 114, 124
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
On June 13, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation with the court indicating that they
14
15
“have reached an agreement in principle to fully resolve this case” and “anticipate filing a
motion for preliminary approval of [their] proposed settlement within the next 30 days.”
16
Dkt. 124. Accordingly, the parties request that the court vacate the hearing date and
17
briefing deadlines regarding defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. 114).
18
Good cause appearing, the court hereby VACATES the July 6, 2016 hearing date
19
for the defendants’ motion to dismiss and the June 17 deadline for defendants’ reply
20
brief. The motion to dismiss (Dkt. 114) is administratively terminated pending the filing of
21
a motion for approval of the proposed settlement. If necessary, the motion to dismiss
22
may be re-noticed for hearing at a future date.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
Dated: June 14, 2016
25
26
27
28
__________________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?