Loop AI Labs, Inc. v. Gatti et al

Filing 995

JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 3/21/2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

LOOP AI LABS INC,
Plaintiff,

8

JUDGMENT

v.

9
10

ANNA GATTI, et al.,
Defendants.

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No. 15-cv-00798-HSG

12

For the reasons stated in the Court’s order imposing terminating sanctions, Dkt. No. 993,

13

judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants. The Court declines to exercise supplemental

14

jurisdiction over Defendant Anna Gatti’s counterclaim, Dkt. No. 197 at 31-32, because it has

15

dismissed the claims over which it had original jurisdiction.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.

16
17

Dated: 3/21/2017
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3); see also Sanford v. MemberWorks, Inc., 625 F.3d 550, 561 (9th Cir.
2010) (“[I]n the usual case in which all federal-law claims are eliminated before trial, the balance
of factors to be considered under the pendent jurisdiction doctrine—judicial economy,
convenience, fairness, and comity—will point toward declining to exercise jurisdiction over the
remaining state-law claims.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).