Borges v. City of Eureka et al

Filing 106

ORDER STAYING CASE; DENYING PENDING MOTIONS WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/29/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 STEPHANY BORGES, 7 8 9 10 Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-00846 YGR ORDER STAYING CASE; DENYING PENDING MOTIONS WITHOUT PREJUDICE v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 67, 72, 77, 105 CITY OF EUREKA, et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 On June 28, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation to stay this case and vacate all currently 13 scheduled dates pending the decision of the en banc panel in Castro v. Cnty. of Los Angeles, 797 14 F.3d 654 (9th Cir. 2015), reh’g en banc granted, 809 F.3d 536 (9th Cir. 2015). (Dkt. No. 105.) 15 Good cause showing, the Court GRANTS the parties’ stipulation. The Clerk is directed to STAY this 16 case and VACATE all dates. 17 In light of the potential impact of the en banc panel’s decision on defendants’ pending 18 motions, and in the interests of judicial economy, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the 19 dispositive motions (Dkt. Nos. 67, 72) and related administrative motion to seal (Dkt. No. 77). The 20 parties are ORDERED to file a notice advising the Court within five (5) business days following 21 issuance of the en banc panel’s decision. Upon receipt of the parties’ notice the Court will 22 schedule a Case Management Conference to discuss the need for further briefing on the previously 23 filed motions, if any, and to set dates for briefing and oral argument accordingly. 24 This Order terminates Docket Numbers 67, 72, 77, and 105. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Date: June 29, 2016 _______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?