Borges v. City of Eureka et al
Filing
106
ORDER STAYING CASE; DENYING PENDING MOTIONS WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/29/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2016)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
STEPHANY BORGES,
7
8
9
10
Plaintiff,
Case No.: 15-cv-00846 YGR
ORDER STAYING CASE; DENYING PENDING
MOTIONS WITHOUT PREJUDICE
v.
Re: Dkt. Nos. 67, 72, 77, 105
CITY OF EUREKA, et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
On June 28, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation to stay this case and vacate all currently
13
scheduled dates pending the decision of the en banc panel in Castro v. Cnty. of Los Angeles, 797
14
F.3d 654 (9th Cir. 2015), reh’g en banc granted, 809 F.3d 536 (9th Cir. 2015). (Dkt. No. 105.)
15
Good cause showing, the Court GRANTS the parties’ stipulation. The Clerk is directed to STAY this
16
case and VACATE all dates.
17
In light of the potential impact of the en banc panel’s decision on defendants’ pending
18
motions, and in the interests of judicial economy, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the
19
dispositive motions (Dkt. Nos. 67, 72) and related administrative motion to seal (Dkt. No. 77). The
20
parties are ORDERED to file a notice advising the Court within five (5) business days following
21
issuance of the en banc panel’s decision. Upon receipt of the parties’ notice the Court will
22
schedule a Case Management Conference to discuss the need for further briefing on the previously
23
filed motions, if any, and to set dates for briefing and oral argument accordingly.
24
This Order terminates Docket Numbers 67, 72, 77, and 105.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Date: June 29, 2016
_______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?