Borges v. City of Eureka et al

Filing 20

CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/30/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2015)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 STEPHANY BORGES, 4 Case No. 15-cv-00846-YGR Plaintiff, 5 v. CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER 6 CITY OF EUREKA, et al., 7 Defendants. 8 TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: 9 The Court hereby sets the following trial and pretrial dates: 10 PRETRIAL SCHEDULE United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Monday, November 9, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. 13 REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE VADAS FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE TO BE COMPLETED BY: September 21, 2015 LAST DAY TO JOIN PARTIES OR AMEND PLEADINGS: Only with Court Order 16 NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF: November 2, 2015 17 DISCLOSURE OF EXPERTS (RETAINED/NONRETAINED): Opening: November 20, 2015 Rebuttal: December 18, 2015 EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF: February 1, 2016 20 DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS1 TO BE HEARD BY: March 1, 2016 21 COMPLIANCE HEARING (SEE PAGE 2) Friday, June 3, 2016 at 9:01 a.m. 22 JOINT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT: June 10, 2016 23 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Friday, June 24, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. 24 TRIAL DATE AND LENGTH: Monday, August 20, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. for 5 days (Jury Trial) 14 15 18 19 25 26 27 1 28 See Standing Order regarding Pre-filing Conference Requirements for motions for summary judgment. 1 Pursuant to the Court’s Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases at Section 2, trial counsel shall meet 2 and confer at least twenty-one (21) days in advance of the Pretrial Conference. The compliance 3 hearing on Friday, June 3, 2016 at 9:01 a.m. is intended to confirm that counsel have reviewed the 4 Court’s Pretrial Setting Instructions and are in compliance therewith. The compliance hearing 5 shall be held in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, in Courtroom 1. 6 Five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file a one-page 7 JOINT STATEMENT confirming they have complied with this requirement or explaining their 8 failure to comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance 9 hearing will be taken off calendar. Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 submitted a joint statement in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in sanctions. The parties must comply with both the Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases and Standing 12 Order for Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases for additional deadlines and procedures. All 13 Standing Orders are available on the Court’s website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygrorders. 14 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 30, 2015 ______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS United States District Court Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?