Erotic Service Provider Legal Education and Research Project v. Gascon et al

Filing 18

ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED 17 STIPULATION Vacating the Case Management Conference set for June 12, 2015 & Setting a Briefing & Hearing Schedule on Motion to Dismiss. Motion due by 5/8/2015. Opposition due by 6/8/2015. Reply due by 6/23/2015. Motion Hearing set for 8/7/2015 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Jeffrey S. White. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 4/20/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2015)

Download PDF
Case4:15-cv-01007-JSW Document17 Filed04/17/15 Page1 of 6 1 7 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California TAMAR PACHTER Supervising Deputy Attorney General SHARON L. O'GRADY Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 102356 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 703-5899 Fax: (415) 703-1234 E-mail: Sharon.OGrady@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendant Kamala D. Hanis 8 [REMAINING PARTIES ON SIGNATURE PAGE] 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 OAKLAND DIVISION 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 EROTIC SERVICE PROVIDER LEGAL EDUCATION & RESEARCH PROJECT; K.L.E.S.; C.V.; J.B.; AND JOHN DOE, STIPULATION AND .[PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING THE CASE ANAGEMENTCONFERENCESET FOR JUNE 12, 2015 AND SETTING A RIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE Plaintiffs, ON MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER FEDERAL RULEOF CIVIL v. PROCEDURE 12(b)(6), GEORGE GASCON, in his official capacity as AS MODIFIED District Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco; EDWARD S. BERBERIAN, JR., in his official capacity as District Attorney of the Judge: The Hon. JeffreyS. White Dept: 5, 2d Floor County of Marin; NANCY E. O'MALLEY, in Trial Date: None Set her official capacity as District Attorney of the CMC Date: June 12, 2015 County of Alameda; JILL RAVITCH, in her Action Filed: March 4, 2015 official capacity as District Attorney of the County of Sonoma; and KAMALA D. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, Defendants. 26 27 28 Case No.: 4:15-CV-01007 JSW STIP & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case No. 4:15-CV-01007 JSW 1 Case4:15-cv-01007-JSW Document17 Filed04/17/15 Page2 of 6 1 2 3 4 Pu~suant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2 and 7-12, the Parties submit and stipulate to the following: WHEREAS, on March 4, 2015, Plaintiffs filed the operative complaint ("Complaint") in this matter; 5 WHEREAS, on March 5, 2015, the Court set the Case Management Conference 6 ("CMC") in tins matter for June 12, 2015, with a joint case management statement due on June 7 7, 2015; 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 WHEREAS, on March 13,2015 and March 24,2015, Plaintiffs sent notices of the lawsuit and requests to waive service to the Defendants, as described in the Declaration of Sharon L. O'Grady, filed herewith ("O'Grady Declaration" or "f'), ~~ 3-4; WHEREAS, Defendants intend to file a motion to dismiss the complaint in tills action pursuant to Rule 12(b(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (id. ~ 5); WHEREAS, on March 30, 2015, the Parties met and conferred telephonically to discuss waiver of service and a mutually acceptable briefing and hearing schedule on Defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint, and a continuance of the CMC to allow the motion to be heard ~ first (id. 5); WHEREAS, the Parties continued to meet and confer via electronic mail up and through April13, 2015, to confirm a briefing and hearing schedule for the motion to dismiss, and consistent with the Court's calendar (see id. ~ 6); NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, and request that the Court order, as follows: 1. The Court shall vacate the June 12, 2015 CMC and all corresponding deadlines and 22 filings; 23 2. Defendants' motion(s) to dismiss shall be filed no later than May 8, 2015; 24 3. Plaintiffs' opposition to the motion(s) to dismiss shall be filed no later than June 8, 25 2015; 26 4. Defendants' reply shall be due June 23, 2015; and 27 28 STIP & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case No. 4:15-CV-01007 JSW 2 Case4:15-cv-01007-JSW Document17 Filed04/17/15 Page3 of 6 1 2 5. The hearing in this matter for the Court to address and hear the Parties' briefing shall August 7 be set for July 31, 2015, at 9:00a.m. PT. 3 4 CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, the Parties request that the Court vacate the current Case 5 Management Conference set for June 12, 2015, and approve the above mentioned briefing 6 schedule. Case4:15-cv-01007-JSW Document17 Filed04/17/15 Page4 of 6 City and County of San Francisco Room 234, City Hall 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102-4682 . Tel: (415) 554-4675 Fax: (415) 554-4699 E-mail: Wayne.Snodgrass@sfgov.org Attorneys for Defendant George Gascon April17, 2015 STEVEN M. WOODSIDE County Counsel in and for the County of Marin By: /s/ SHEILA=:==;;'L=::;';IC::::;::H~T=B::-::L~A-:::-U-=----== Deputy County Counsel 3501 Civic Center Dr# 275 San Rafael, CA 94903 Tel: (415) 499-6117 E-mail: SLichtblau@marincounty.org Attorneys for Defendant Edward Berberian April17,2015 BRUCE GOLDSTEIN County Counsel in and for the County of Sonoma By: /s/ JOSHU~A~MY~=E~R=s=======- Deputy County Counsel 575 Administration Dr. Santa Rosa, CA 95403 Tel: (707) 565-2421 E-mail: J oshua.Myers@sonoma-county.org Attorneys for Defendant Jill Ravitch April17, 2015 By: /s/ H.Lou·~r=s~s=~~KIN~~=-==------ BRIAN PATRICK O'CONNOR · SANTEN HUGHES LP A 600 Vine Street, Suite 2700 Cincinnati, OH 45202 Tel: (513) 721-4450 Fax: (513) 721-0109 E-mail: bpo@santen-hughes.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs 28 STIP & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case No. 4:15-CV-01007 JSW 4 Case4:15-cv-01007-JSW Document17 Filed04/17/15 Page5 of 6 ORDER 1 2 3 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 20, 2015 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case No. 4:15-CV-01007 JSW 5 The Honorable Jeffrey S. White United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?