Federal Trade Commission v. DIRECTV, Inc. et al

Filing 419

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 418 Stipulation Re: Request to Postpone CMC.Case Management Conference set for 10/2/2018 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Eric D. Edmondson, D.C. Bar No. 450294 Erika Wodinsky, Cal. Bar No. 091700 Evan Rose, Cal. Bar No. 253478 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 901 Market Street, Suite 570 San Francisco, CA 94103 Telephone: (415) 848-5100 Facsimile: (415) 848-5184 eedmondson@ftc.gov; ewodinsky@ftc.gov; erose@ftc.gov 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Stacy Procter, Cal. Bar No. 221078 Kenneth H. Abbe, Cal. Bar No. 172416 Faye Chen Barnouw, Cal. Bar No. 168631 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 10990 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90024 Telephone: (310) 824-4300 Facsimile: (310) 824-4380 sprocter@ftc.gov; kabbe@ftc.gov; fbarnouw@ftc.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 13 14 Jeffrey M. Tillotson, SBN 139372 TILLOTSON LAW 1807 Ross Avenue, Suite 325 Dallas, TX 75201 Telephone: (214) 382-3040 jtillotson@TillotsonLaw.com Pete Marketos, Pro Hac Vice REESE GORDON MARKETOS LLP 750 North Saint Paul, Suite 610 Dallas, TX 75201 Telephone: (214) 382-9810 pete.marketos@rgmfirm.com Chad S. Hummel, SBN 139055 Mark D. Campbell, SBN 180528 Bridget S. Johnsen, SBN 210778 Ryan M. Sandrock, SBN 251781 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 California Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 722-1200 Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 chummel@sidley.com; mcampbell@sidley.com; bjohnsen@sidley.com; rsandrock@sidley.com Attorneys for Defendants DIRECTV and DIRECTV, LLC 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 OAKLAND DIVISION 19 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 20 Plaintiff, 21 22 vs. DIRECTV, a corporation, and DIRECTV, LLC, a limited liability company, Case No. 4:15-cv-01129-HSG STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO POSTPONE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Assigned to: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 23 Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 4:15-cv-01129-HSG STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO POSTPONE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, defendants DIRECTV and DIRECTV, 2 LLC (collectively, “DIRECTV”) and plaintiff Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) hereby 3 stipulate to and respectfully request a four-week postponement of the case management 4 conference currently scheduled for September 4, 2018 (see Dkt. No. 118 at p. 45). The parties 5 respectfully ask that the case management conference be continued until October 2, 2018 at 2:00 6 p.m. or another date and time convenient to the Court. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the 7 reasons for the requested modification are set forth in the declaration of Eric Edmondson 8 accompanying this filing. 9 10 Date: August 29, 2018 Respectfully Submitted, 11 12 By: /s/ Eric Edmondson Eric D. Edmondson Counsel for Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission By: /s/ Pete Marketos Pete Marketos Counsel for Defendants DIRECTV and DIRECTV, LLC 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 FILER’S ATTESTATION I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing 22 Parties’ Joint Submission. I hereby attest that the signatory has concurred in this filing. 23 Date: August 29, 2018 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 24 25 26 By: /s/ Ryan M. Sandrock Ryan M. Sandrock 27 28 ____________________________________________________________________________ Case No. 4:15-cv-01129-HSG 2 STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO POSTPONE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED EXCEPT THAT: 3 The Case Management Conference is continued to October 2, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. 4 5 6 Dated: August 30, 2018 ___________________________________ Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 4:15-cv-01129-HSG 3 STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO POSTPONE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?