Capili v. The Finish Line, Inc., et al

Filing 45

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 44 Stipulation Selecting Private ADR. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2017)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RITAROSE CAPILI,

CASE NO. 4:15-cv-01158-HSG

Plaintiff,
vs.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

THE FINISH LINE, INC.; CIGNA HEALTH
CORPORATION; LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA; AND
DOES 1-100,
Defendant.

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following
ADR process:

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
 Private ADR (specify process and provider)
Private Mediation with Alan R. Berkowitz, Esq.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a
Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of
Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use
this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and
ADR L.R. 3-5.

 the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless
otherwise ordered.)
 other requested deadline: January 31, 2018
Date: September 18, 2017

/s/ Allan A. Villanueva
Attorney for Plaintiff, Ritarose Capili

Date: September 18, 2017

/s/ Dennis M. Brown
Attorney for Defendants, CIGNA Health
Corporation; Life Insurance Company of North
America

Date: September 18, 2017

/s/ Thomas M. McInerney
Attorney for Defendant, The Finish Line, Inc.

X
 IT IS SO ORDERED
 IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
Date:

9/19/2017
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Private ADR.”