Capili v. The Finish Line, Inc., et al

Filing 45

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 44 Stipulation Selecting Private ADR. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2017)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RITAROSE CAPILI, CASE NO. 4:15-cv-01158-HSG Plaintiff, vs. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS THE FINISH LINE, INC.; CIGNA HEALTH CORPORATION; LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA; AND DOES 1-100, Defendant. Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:  Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)  Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)  Private ADR (specify process and provider) Private Mediation with Alan R. Berkowitz, Esq. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5.  the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered.)  other requested deadline: January 31, 2018 Date: September 18, 2017 /s/ Allan A. Villanueva Attorney for Plaintiff, Ritarose Capili Date: September 18, 2017 /s/ Dennis M. Brown Attorney for Defendants, CIGNA Health Corporation; Life Insurance Company of North America Date: September 18, 2017 /s/ Thomas M. McInerney Attorney for Defendant, The Finish Line, Inc. X  IT IS SO ORDERED  IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: Date: 9/19/2017 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.”

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?