Lawman v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 212

ORDER to Submit Further Information re Plaintiff's Police Practices Expert. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 07/28/2016. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

GARY RICHARD LAWMAN,

Case No. 15-cv-01202-DMR

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10

Defendants.

12

The reports of Plaintiff’s police practices expert, David Dusenbury, contain many

13

references to Office of Citizen Complaints (“OCC”) materials. However, in Plaintiff’s motion in

14

limine no. 6, Plaintiff takes the position that Dusenbury’s reliance on the OCC materials will be

15

limited “to the extent [the materials] reveal that the SFPD either failed to advise the complainant

16

he could arrange for blood-alcohol testing, or that requests to arrange for such tests were

17

repeatedly refused by the SFPD, despite a stated SFPD policy to facilitate those tests when

18

requested.” See Docket No. 137 at 2. Therefore, by no later than 12:00 p.m. on August 1, 2016,

19

Plaintiff shall file a letter to the court confirming that Dusenbury’s testimony regarding the OCC

20

materials will be limited to the subject matter described above. He shall also confirm that Plaintiff

21

is withdrawing any other opinions by Dusenbury based on the OCC materials that are outside the
scope of the subject matter described above.

27

S

o
Judge D

D

R NIA

RDERE

______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu
u
United States MagistrateyJudge
a M. R

RT

nn

ER

H

28

OO
IT IS S

FO

26

Dated: July 28, 2016

LI

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

NO

24

RT
U
O

23

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

A

22

UNIT
ED

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,

ORDER TO SUBMIT FURTHER
INFORMATION RE PLAINTIFF’S
POLICE PRACTICES EXPERT

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C