Lawman v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 215

SECOND ORDER to Submit Further Information re Plaintiff's Police Practices Expert. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 08/02/2016. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

GARY RICHARD LAWMAN,

Case No. 15-cv-01202-DMR

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,

SECOND ORDER TO SUBMIT
FURTHER INFORMATION RE
PLAINTIFF'S POLICE PRACTICES
EXPERT

Defendants.
Plaintiff’s police practices expert, David Dusenbury, has offered four expert reports, dated

13

March 21, 2016; April 4, 2016; May 2, 2016; and May 31, 2016. By no later than 10:00 a.m. on

14

August 3, 2016, Plaintiff shall file a letter to the court identifying all of the specific Dusenbury

15

opinions Plaintiff will offer at trial. Plaintiff shall identify all of the opinions he plans to offer by

16

opinion number and/or letter and page number in each of the four Dusenbury reports. Plaintiff

17

will not be permitted to offer at trial any opinions that he does not identify in his submission.

18

Additionally, in Plaintiff’s motion in limine no. 6 and August 1, 2016 letter to the court,

19

Plaintiff asserts that Dusenbury will testify about a subset of OCC materials in connection with his

20

Monell claim. The court would like to review those specific OCC materials in advance of the

21

August 3, 2016 second pretrial conference. Since Defendants have offered some OCC materials

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

as trial exhibits, in the same letter to the court due by 10:00 a.m. on August 3, 2016, Plaintiff shall
identify which, if any, of Defendants’ proposed exhibits contain the OCC materials on which
Plaintiff will rely.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 2, 2016
______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge