Bonete v. World Savings Bank, FSB et al
Filing
27
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 11/10/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
JOSE A. BONETE,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Plaintiff,
No. C 15-01219 JSW
v.
12
WORLD SAVINGS BANK, FSB, et al.,
13
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Defendants.
/
14
15
On August 11, 2015, this Court granted Defendant Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss and
16
granted Plaintiff leave to amend only as to his claims for violation of Section 17200 and fraud
17
and intentional deceit under California Civil Code section 1709. The Court indicated that
18
Plaintiff was permitted to file an amended complaint by no later than September 4, 2015. The
19
Court further admonished that failure to file an amended complaint by September 4, 2015
20
would result in dismissal of this action. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint.
21
Thereafter, on October 6, 2015, Defendant moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
22
Procedure 41(b) to dismiss the matter with prejudice for failure to timely amend following a
23
12(b)(6) motion. See Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 1999).
24
Having not received a timely opposition to the motion to dismiss, on November 2, 2015,
25
Defendant filed a notice of non-receipt of opposition. Accordingly, Plaintiff has had multiple
26
notices of his failure to amend the complaint.
27
28
As indicated in its original order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss with leave to
amend, having received no amended complaint, the Court HEREBY DISMISSES this action
1
2
with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
Dated: November 10, 2015
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?