Packnett v. Alvarez et al

Filing 79

**** ATTACHMENT IS NOT FOR THIS CASE. DOCKETED IN THIS CASE IN ERROR. SEE DKT. NO. 80 FOR CORRECT ENTRY*** ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS; AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR A SEVENTH EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A COMPLETE OPPOSITION by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 47 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 77 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2017) Modified on 9/21/2017 (fs, COURT STAFF). Modified on 9/21/2017 (fs, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

LAMONT PUCKETT,

Case No. 16-cv-05878-YGR (PR)

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10

JAMIE CORTES, et al.,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR SECOND EXTENSION
OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANTS’ DISPOSITIVE
MOTION

Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
Plaintiff has filed a request for a second extension of time in which to file his opposition to

12
13

Defendants’ dispositive motion. Having read and considered Plaintiff’s request, and good cause

14

appearing,

15

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for a second extension of time is

16

GRANTED. The time in which Plaintiff may file his opposition to Defendants’ dispositive

17

motion will be extended up to and including twenty-eight (28) days from the date of this Order.
Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than fourteen (14) days after the date Plaintiff’s

18
19

opposition is filed.

20

This Order terminates Docket No. 27.

21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated:

______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
United States District Court Judge