Packnett v. Alvarez et al
**** ATTACHMENT IS NOT FOR THIS CASE. DOCKETED IN THIS CASE IN ERROR. SEE DKT. NO. 80 FOR CORRECT ENTRY*** ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS; AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR A SEVENTH EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A COMPLETE OPPOSITION by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 47 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 77 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2017) Modified on 9/21/2017 (fs, COURT STAFF). Modified on 9/21/2017 (fs, COURT STAFF).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 16-cv-05878-YGR (PR)
JAMIE CORTES, et al.,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR SECOND EXTENSION
OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Plaintiff has filed a request for a second extension of time in which to file his opposition to
Defendants’ dispositive motion. Having read and considered Plaintiff’s request, and good cause
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for a second extension of time is
GRANTED. The time in which Plaintiff may file his opposition to Defendants’ dispositive
motion will be extended up to and including twenty-eight (28) days from the date of this Order.
Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than fourteen (14) days after the date Plaintiff’s
opposition is filed.
This Order terminates Docket No. 27.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
United States District Court Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?