Ashton Woods Holdings L.L.C. et al v. USG Corporation et al

Filing 79

ORDER. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 3/8/2021. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2021)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 ASHTON WOODS HOLDINGS L.L.C., et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 15-cv-01247-HSG ORDER 9 v. 10 11 USG CORPORATION, et al., United States District Court Northern District of California Defendants. 12 13 The Court intends to impose time limits on each party at trial. Each party is DIRECTED 14 to submit with their pretrial filings (1) the projected duration of the direct examination of each of 15 its witnesses; (2) the anticipated duration of the cross-examination of each of the other party’s 16 disclosed witnesses; (3) the total number of hours projected (i.e., the sum of categories (1) and 17 (2)); and (4) the estimated number of hours they expect their case to take (including opening, 18 direct and cross examinations, and closing). These estimates should be realistic, not padded, and 19 the Court ultimately will independently determine a reasonable hours limit assuming maximum 20 efficiency by the parties in scoping and presenting their cases. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3/8/2021 ______________________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?