Ashton Woods Holdings L.L.C. et al v. USG Corporation et al

Filing 85

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 83 (Unopposed) Motion to Shorten Time. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2021)

Case 4:15-cv-01247-HSG Document 85 Filed 03/16/21 Page 1 of 2

1 BRS LLP
Keith L. Butler (Cal. Bar No. 215670)
2 [e-mail]
Cindy Reichline (Cal. Bar No. 234947)
3 [e-mail]
12100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 800
4 Los Angeles, CA 90025
Telephone: [phone]
5
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
6 SULLIVAN LLP
Diane Doolittle (Cal. Bar No. 142046)
7 [e-mail]
555 Twin Dolphin Dr., 5th Floor
8 Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone: [phone]
9 Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
10
(additional counsel listed on signature page)
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
OAKLAND DIVISION
13
) CASE NO. 4:15-cv-01247-HSG
ASHTON WOODS HOLDINGS, L.L.C.; BEAZER
)
14 HOMES HOLDINGS CORP.; CALATLANTIC
GROUP, INC.; D.R. HORTON LOS ANGELES
) Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
15 HOLDING COMPANY, INC.; HOVNANIAN
)
ENTERPRISES, INC.; KB HOME; MERITAGE
) ORDER GRANTING
16 HOMES CORPORATION; M/I HOMES, INC.;
) PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED
PULTE HOME CORPORATION; THE DREES
17 COMPANY; TOLL BROTHERS, INC.; TRI POINTE ) MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME
HOMES, INC.,
)
)
18
Plaintiffs,
)
19
)
vs.
)
20
USG CORPORATION; UNITED STATES GYPSUM )
21 COMPANY; L&W SUPPLY CORPORATION; NEW )
NGC, INC.; LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA, INC.; )
22 CONTINENTAL BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC.;
)
CERTAINTEED GYPSUM, INC.; AMERICAN
)
23 GYPSUM COMPANY LLC; TIN, INC., d/b/a
)
TEMPLE-INLAND, INC.; PABCO BUILDING
)
24 PRODUCTS, LLC.,
)
)
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
Case No. 4:15-cv-01247-HSG
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME

Case 4:15-cv-01247-HSG Document 85 Filed 03/16/21 Page 2 of 2

1
2

ORDER
Having considered Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion to Shorten Time for Hearing on Plaintiffs’

3 Motion for Live-Streamed Trial Testimony Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 43, the Court finds good cause
4 to grant the motion. Accordingly, Defendants’ opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Live-Streamed
5 Trial Testimony Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 43 will be due March 29, 2021. Plaintiffs’ reply will be
6 due April 2, 2021. The hearing date of June 24, 2021 is VACATED. Upon conclusion of the briefing
7 schedule, the Court will set a hearing date if it determines that a hearing is necessary.
8
9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12
13

Dated: 3/16/2021

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 4:15-cv-01247-HSG
1
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME