Lillard v. Colvin
Filing
16
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore GRANTING AS MODIFIED Plaintiff's counsel's 14 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
Geri N. Kahn (State Bar Number 148536)
geri@gerinkahn.com
Law Office of Geri N. Kahn
465 California Street, Suite 609
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel. (415) 397-5446
Fax (800) 375-5956
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Andrealius Quincy Lillard
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OAKLAND DIVISION
11
Andrealius Quincy Lillard
Case No. 4:15-cv-01279 KAW
12
Plaintiff
13
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
WITHDRAW AS MODIFIED
vs.
14
15
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social
Security
16
Defendant
17
18
19
Good cause appearing, Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Plaintiff may
have until October 12, 2015 to file his Motion for Summary Judgment.
20
Should Plaintiff be unable to secure new counsel, he may wish to contact the Federal Pro Bono
21
Project’s Help Desk for assistance—a free service for pro se litigants—by calling (415) 782-8982.
22
Plaintiff may also wish to consult a manual the court has adopted to assist pro se litigants in presenting
23
their case. This manual, and other free information for pro se litigants, is available online at:
24
http://cand.uscourts.gov/proselitigants.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
30
31
Case No. 4:15-cv-01279 KAW
1
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS MODIFIED
1
Additionally, because Plaintiff has not consented to the withdrawal and no substitution of
2
counsel has been filed, all papers from the court and from Defendant shall continue to be served on
3
Plaintiff’s counsel for forwarding purposes until a substitution of counsel is filed. See Civil L.R. 11-
4
5(b).
5
Dated: August 27, 2015
6
7
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
31
Case No. 4:15-cv-01279 KAW
2
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS MODIFIED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?