Phoenix Technologies Ltd. v. VMware, Inc.

Filing 302

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING PHOENIXS MOTIONS IN LIMINE NO. 4 & 5 RE 286 . (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

OAKLAND DIVISION

11
12
13

PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD., a
Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff,

14
15
16

VMWARE, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Defendant.
VMWARE, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Counterclaimant,

19
20
21
22

ORDER DENYING PHOENIX’S
MOTIONS IN LIMINE NO. 4 & 5

v.

17
18

Case No. 15-cv-01414-HSG

v.
PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD., a
Delaware corporation,
Counterdefendant.

23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PHOENIX’S MOTIONS IN LIMINE NO. 4 & 5
CASE NO. 15-cv-01414-HSG
sf-3756533

1

Having reviewed Plaintiff Pho
g
P
oenix Techno
ologies Ltd.’ Motions in Limine No 4 and 5,
’s
n
o.

2

the supporting materials fi therewit Defendan VMware, Inc.’s oppos
e
g
iled
th,
nt
sitions theret and
to,

3

co
onsidering ar
rguments at the February 2, 2017, Pr
t
y
retrial Confe
erence, for th reasons st
he
tated on the

4

rec
cord, the mo
otions are DE
ENIED.

5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: April 13, 2017
HON. HA
AYWOOD S. GILLIAM JR.
M,
Uni States D
ited
District Judge
e

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORD DENYING PHOENIX’S MOTIONS IN LIMIN NO. 4 & 5
R
DER
NE
CASE NO. 15-cvA
-01414-HSG
sf-3756533