Phoenix Technologies Ltd. v. VMware, Inc.
Filing
344
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 343 Joint Request Permitting Use of Equipment in the Courtroom. (terminating docket no. 339 in light of docket no. 343 ).(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
MICHAEL ATTANASIO (CA SBN 151529)
mattanasio@cooley.com
WHITTY SOMVICHIAN (CA SBN 194463)
wsomvichian@cooley.com
AMANDA A. MAIN (CA SBN 260814)
(amain@cooley.com)
DREW KONING (CA SBN 263082)
(dkoning@cooley.com)
AARTI G. REDDY (CA SBN 274889)
(areddy@cooley.com)
COOLEY LLP
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-5800
Telephone: 415.693.2000
Facsimile: 415.693.2222
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
10
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
MJacobs@mofo.com
ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ (CA SBN 121490)
AGonzalez@mofo.com
ALEXIS A. AMEZCUA (CA SBN 247507)
AAmezcua@mofo.com
DIANA KRUZE (CA SBN 247605)
DKruze@mofo.com
CHRISTOPHER L. ROBINSON (CA SBN
260778)
ChristopherRobinson@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: 415.268.7000
Facsimile: 415.268.7522
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
VMWARE, INC.
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
OAKLAND DIVISION
14
15
PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., a Delaware
corporation,
16
Plaintiff,
17
v.
Case No. 15-cv-01414 HSG
JOINT REQUEST AND ORDER
PERMITTING USE OF
EQUIPMENT IN THE
COURTROOM
18
VMWARE, INC., a Delaware corporation,
19
Defendant.
Trial Date: May 30, 2017
Time: 8:30 AM
Ctrm 2, 4th Floor
20
21
VMWARE, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Counterclaimant,
22
23
24
v.
PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD., a Delaware
corporation,
25
Counterdefendant.
26
27
28
JOINT REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING USE OF EQUIPMENT IN THE COURTROOM
Case No. 15-cv-01414 HSG
sf-3768107
1
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Phoenix Technologies Ltd. and Defendant VMware, Inc. (hereafter,
2
“the Parties”) jointly seeks to use certain equipment and devices at trial starting on May 30, 2017;
3
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY REQUESTED:
4
1.
The Parties and their attorneys, paralegals, assistants and consultants may bring the
5
6
following materials into the courtroom for use at trial beginning on May 30, 2017:
7
laptop computers;
8
laser pointers;
9
LCD monitors;
10
various cables, cords, adaptors, and power strips;
tech tables;
13
printers;
14
boxes of documents and supplies
11
12
15
16
17
2.
Beginning at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, May 24, 2017, the Parties and their
attorneys, paralegals, assistants and consultants may have access to the courtroom to set up and
test the above-listed equipment so that the Parties will be prepared to proceed with trial as
18
19
scheduled.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING USE OF EQUIPMENT IN THE COURTROOM
Case No. 15-cv-01414 HSG
sf-3768107
1
1
Dated: May 18, 2017
COOLEY LLP
2
By:
3
4
Attorneys for Plaintiff
and Counterdefendant
PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.
5
6
7
/s/ Whitty Somvichian
WHITTY SOMVICHIAN
Dated: May 18, 2017
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
8
By:
9
10
/s/Arturo J. González
ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ
Attorneys for Defendant
and Counterclaimant
VMWARE, INC.
11
12
13
14
ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE
15
I, Arturo J. González, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
16
Declaration. In compliance with Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3) and General Order No. 45, § X.B., I hereby
17
attest that Whitty Somvichian has concurred in this filing.
18
19
Dated:
May 18, 2017
/s/ Arturo J. González
ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING USE OF EQUIPMENT IN THE COURTROOM
Case No. 15-cv-01414 HSG
sf-3768107
2
1
IT IS SO ORDERE
S
ED.
2
3
Da
ated: May 18, 2017
1
4
5
HAYW
WOOD S. GIL
LLIAM, JR.
.
U
UNITED ST
TATES DIST
TRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOIN REQUEST AN [PROPOSED] ORDER PERM
NT
ND
MITTING USE OF EQUIPMENT IN THE COURTR
F
N
ROOM
Case No. 15-cv-01
1414 HSG
-3768107
sf-
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?