Phoenix Technologies Ltd. v. VMware, Inc.

Filing 344

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 343 Joint Request Permitting Use of Equipment in the Courtroom. (terminating docket no. 339 in light of docket no. 343 ).(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MICHAEL ATTANASIO (CA SBN 151529) mattanasio@cooley.com WHITTY SOMVICHIAN (CA SBN 194463) wsomvichian@cooley.com AMANDA A. MAIN (CA SBN 260814) (amain@cooley.com) DREW KONING (CA SBN 263082) (dkoning@cooley.com) AARTI G. REDDY (CA SBN 274889) (areddy@cooley.com) COOLEY LLP 101 California Street, 5th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-5800 Telephone: 415.693.2000 Facsimile: 415.693.2222 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD. 10 MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) MJacobs@mofo.com ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ (CA SBN 121490) AGonzalez@mofo.com ALEXIS A. AMEZCUA (CA SBN 247507) AAmezcua@mofo.com DIANA KRUZE (CA SBN 247605) DKruze@mofo.com CHRISTOPHER L. ROBINSON (CA SBN 260778) ChristopherRobinson@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant VMWARE, INC. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 OAKLAND DIVISION 14 15 PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., a Delaware corporation, 16 Plaintiff, 17 v. Case No. 15-cv-01414 HSG JOINT REQUEST AND ORDER PERMITTING USE OF EQUIPMENT IN THE COURTROOM 18 VMWARE, INC., a Delaware corporation, 19 Defendant. Trial Date: May 30, 2017 Time: 8:30 AM Ctrm 2, 4th Floor 20 21 VMWARE, INC., a Delaware corporation, Counterclaimant, 22 23 24 v. PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD., a Delaware corporation, 25 Counterdefendant. 26 27 28 JOINT REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING USE OF EQUIPMENT IN THE COURTROOM Case No. 15-cv-01414 HSG sf-3768107 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiff Phoenix Technologies Ltd. and Defendant VMware, Inc. (hereafter, 2 “the Parties”) jointly seeks to use certain equipment and devices at trial starting on May 30, 2017; 3 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY REQUESTED: 4 1. The Parties and their attorneys, paralegals, assistants and consultants may bring the 5 6 following materials into the courtroom for use at trial beginning on May 30, 2017: 7  laptop computers; 8  laser pointers; 9  LCD monitors; 10  various cables, cords, adaptors, and power strips;  tech tables; 13  printers; 14  boxes of documents and supplies 11 12 15 16 17 2. Beginning at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, May 24, 2017, the Parties and their attorneys, paralegals, assistants and consultants may have access to the courtroom to set up and test the above-listed equipment so that the Parties will be prepared to proceed with trial as 18 19 scheduled. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING USE OF EQUIPMENT IN THE COURTROOM Case No. 15-cv-01414 HSG sf-3768107 1 1 Dated: May 18, 2017 COOLEY LLP 2 By: 3 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. 5 6 7 /s/ Whitty Somvichian WHITTY SOMVICHIAN Dated: May 18, 2017 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 8 By: 9 10 /s/Arturo J. González ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant VMWARE, INC. 11 12 13 14 ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE 15 I, Arturo J. González, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 16 Declaration. In compliance with Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3) and General Order No. 45, § X.B., I hereby 17 attest that Whitty Somvichian has concurred in this filing. 18 19 Dated: May 18, 2017 /s/ Arturo J. González ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING USE OF EQUIPMENT IN THE COURTROOM Case No. 15-cv-01414 HSG sf-3768107 2 1 IT IS SO ORDERE S ED. 2 3 Da ated: May 18, 2017 1 4 5 HAYW WOOD S. GIL LLIAM, JR. . U UNITED ST TATES DIST TRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOIN REQUEST AN [PROPOSED] ORDER PERM NT ND MITTING USE OF EQUIPMENT IN THE COURTR F N ROOM Case No. 15-cv-01 1414 HSG -3768107 sf- 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?