Phoenix Technologies Ltd. v. VMware, Inc.

Filing 481

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 479 Motion to Reschedule Hearing of VMware's 462 Motion for Attorneys Fees & Costs. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

COOLEY LLP
MICHAEL A. ATTANASIO (151529)
([e-mail])
WHITTY SOMVICHIAN (194463)
([e-mail])
AMANDA A. MAIN (260814)
([e-mail])
DREW KONING (263082)
([e-mail])
AARTI G. REDDY (274889)
([e-mail])
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (111664)
([e-mail])
ARTURO J. GONZALEZ (121490)
([e-mail])
ALEXIS A. AMEZCUA (247507)
([e-mail])
DIANE B. KRUZE (247605)
([e-mail])
CHRISTOPHER L. ROBINSON (260778)
([e-mail])
425 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD.

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
VMWARE, INC.

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

OAKLAND DIVISION

14
15

PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD., a
Delaware Corporation,

16
Plaintiff,
17

Case No. 15-cv-01414-HSG
STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE HEARING
OF VMWARE’S MOTION FOR
ATTORNEYS’ FEES & COSTS

v.
18
VMWARE, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

Ctrm: Courtroom 2, 4th Floor

19
Defendant.
20
VMWARE, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

21
Counterclaimant,
22
v.
23
24
25

PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD., a
Delaware Corporation,
Counterdefendant.

26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE HEARING OF VMWARE’S
MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES & COSTS
CASE NO. 15-CV-01414 HSG

1

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), Plaintiff Phoenix Technologies, Ltd. (“Phoenix”) and

2

Defendant VMware, Inc.’s (“VMware”) (collectively, “the parties”) by and through their respective

3

counsel, stipulate to the following relating to the Hearing on VMware’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees

4

and Costs:

5
6
7

WHEREAS, on August 17, 2017, VMware filed its Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs
(“VMware’s Motion”) and noticed a hearing date of September 28, 2017 (Dkt. No. 462); and
WHEREAS, on August 31, 2017, Phoenix filed its Opposition to VMware’s Motion for

8

Attorneys’ Fees and Costs on August 31, 2017 (Dkt. No. 468) and VMware filed its Reply Brief In

9

Support of Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs on September 7, 2017 (Dkt. No. 477); and

10

WHEREAS, also on August 31, 2017, Phoenix filed a Renewed Motion for Judgment as a

11

Matter of Law and Motion for New Trial (“Phoenix’s Motion”). Dkt. No. 467.

12

The Hearing on

Phoenix’s Motion is scheduled for November 9, 2017. Dkt. No. 471.

13

WHEREAS, the parties met and conferred regarding the Hearing on VMware’s Motion; and

14

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that rescheduling the Hearing on VMware’s Motion to

15

November 9, 2017, the same date as the Hearing on Phoenix’s Motion, serves the interest of judicial

16

efficiency.

17

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and request that the Hearing scheduled for

18

September 28, 2017 on VMware’s Motion be rescheduled to November 9, 2017.

19

IT IS SO STIPULATED

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

1.

STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE HEARING OF VMWARE’S
MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES & COSTS
CASE NO. 15-CV-01414 HSG

1

Dated
d:

Sep
ptember 14, 2017

COOL
LEY LLP

2
/s/ Whi Somvich
itty
hian 1
Whitty Somvichian (194463)
y
n
Attorne for Plain and Cou
eys
ntiff
unterdefenda
ant
PHOEN TECHN
NIX
NOLOGIES LTD.
S

3
4
5
6

Dated
d:

Sep
ptember 14, 2017

MORR
RISON & FO
OERSTER L
LLP

7
/s/ Mic
chael A. Jaco
obs
Michae A. Jacobs
el
s
Attorne for Defe
eys
endant and C
Counterclaim
mant
VMWA
ARE, INC.

8
9
10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDE
S
ERED.

13
14
15

Dated Septembe 15, 2017
d:
er

_
__________
___________
__________
__________
H
Honorable H
Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

150798677

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

I, Whitty Somvichian, am the ECF User whose ID and password i being used to file this S
W
e
w
d
is
d
Stipulation. In
n
comp
pliance with Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3). I here attest tha Michael A Jacobs has concurred in this filing.
C
eby
at
A.
n

COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

2.

STIPULA
ATION TO RESCHE
EDULE HEARING O VMWARE’S
OF
MOTION FO ATTORNEYS’ FEES & COSTS
OR
CASE NO. 15-C -01414 HSG
CV