Phoenix Technologies Ltd. v. VMware, Inc.
Filing
501
ORDER DIRECTING SUPPLEMENTAL FILING REGARDING PARTIES REQUESTS WITH RESPECT TO COSTS Re Docket No. 497 . Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 5/22/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2018)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
VMWARE, INC.,
Defendant.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No.15-cv-01414-HSG
ORDER DIRECTING SUPPLEMENTAL
FILING REGARDING PARTIES’
REQUESTS WITH RESPECT TO
COSTS
Re: Dkt. No. 497
12
Pending before the Court is Defendant VMware, Inc.’s motion for review of the Clerk’s
13
14
taxation of costs. See Dkt. No. 497.
Defendant sought $900,951.22 in its Second Amended Bill of Costs, filed September 20,
15
16
2017. Dkt. No. 483. On September 22, 2018, Plaintiff Phoenix Technologies, Ltd. objected to
17
$708,076.10 of the costs sought by Defendant. Dkt. No. 486. The Clerk subsequently taxed costs
18
in the amount of $187,626.44, disallowing $713,324.78 of Defendant’s request. Dkt. No. 496.
19
With its pending motion, Defendant now purports to seek $900,853.72, see Dkt. No. 497 at 2,
20
although it later reduced the amount of its request by at least $4,883.56, see Dkt. No. 500 at 12.
21
Plaintiff, for its part, now objects to at least $785,139.16. See Dkt. No. 499 at 1. Moreover, the
22
parties are not always entirely clear regarding the final outcome they seek.
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
//
1
To assist the Court in deciding Defendant’s pending motion, the Court DIRECTS the
2
parties to meet and confer and complete the chart attached hereto as Exhibit A. The parties shall
3
jointly submit the completed chart by May 25, 2018. Further, unless the Court directs the parties
4
otherwise, the matter will be deemed submitted upon the parties’ submission of the chart and the
5
hearing set for May 23, 2018 is VACATED.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 22, 2018
8
9
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?