Estate of Robert Renzel, Deceased et al v. Ventura et al

Filing 197

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying 194 Motion to Appear by Telephone. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Jeffery L. Caufield (SBN 166524) jeff@caufieldjames.com Santino M. Tropea (SBN 249215) santino@caufieldjames.com CAUFIELD & JAMES, LLP 2851 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 410 San Diego, California 92108 Telephone: 619-325-0441 Facsimile: 619-325-0231 Attorneys for Defendants, CounterClaimants, and Cross-Claimants, Alfredo Torres and Carmen Torres 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ESTATE OF ROBERT RENZEL, DECEASED, by and through his 13 successors in interest, Susan Carter and Ann Renzel Sebastian, et al. 12 14 15 16 Plaintiffs, v. 17 18 19 LUPE VENTURA, an individual and dba Ritz Cleaners, et al. Defendants. Case No.: 4:15-cv-01648-HSG ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS CARMEN AND ALFREDO TORRES’ REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Hearing Date: Hearing Time: Courtroom: Judge: Gilliam, Jr. October 17, 2017 2:00 p.m. 2, 4th Floor Hon. Haywood S. Action Filed: April 10, 2015 Trial Date: None set 20 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS AND CROSS22 CLAIMS. 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE 1 Defendants Carmen Torres and Alfredo Torres’ request for their counsel to 2 appear by telephone at the Case Management Conference hearing, scheduled for 3 October 17, 2017, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 2 of the Ronald V. Dellums 4 Federal Building and United States Courthouse, is hereby DENIED. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 DATED: October 16, 2017 HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE Case No. 15-CV-01648-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?