Estate of Robert Renzel, Deceased et al v. Ventura et al
Filing
314
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 313 Motion to Appear by Telephone. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2019)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Jeffery L. Caufield (SBN 166524)
jeff@caufieldjames.com
Santino M. Tropea (SBN 249215)
santino@caufieldjames.com
CAUFIELD & JAMES, LLP
2851 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 410
San Diego, California 92108
Telephone: 619-325-0441
Facsimile: 619-325-0231
Attorneys for Defendants, CounterClaimants, and Cross-Claimants,
Alfredo Torres and Carmen Torres
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
ESTATE OF ROBERT RENZEL,
DECEASED, by and through his
13 successors in interest, Susan Carter
and Ann Renzel Sebastian, et al.
12
14
15
16
Plaintiffs,
v.
17
18
19
LUPE VENTURA, an individual
and dba Ritz Cleaners, et al.
Defendants.
20
Case No.: 4:15-cv-01648-HSG
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
DEFENDANTS CARMEN AND
ALFREDO TORRES’ REQUEST TO
APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT
CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
Hearing Date:
Hearing Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:
Gilliam, Jr.
June 4, 2019
2:00 p.m.
2, 4th Floor
Hon. Haywood S.
Action Filed: April 10, 2015
Trial Date:
None set
AND RELATED
COUNTERCLAIMS AND CROSS22 CLAIMS.
21
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE
1
Defendants Carmen Torres and Alfredo Torres’ request for their counsel to
2
appear by telephone at the hearing scheduled for June 4, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. in
3
Courtroom 2 of the Oakland Office of the Northern District, is hereby GRANTED.
4
5
Counsel is instructed to contact CourtCall directly at (866) 582-6878 for
telephonic appearance.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
DATED: 5/29/20192018
May__,
HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE
Case No. 15-CV-01648-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?