Estate of Robert Renzel, Deceased et al v. Ventura et al

Filing 325

ORDER GRANTING 324 Request for Dismissal Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(a) (2). ***Civil Case Terminated.***Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 8/23/2019. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Bret A. Stone SBN 190161 BStone@PaladinLaw.com SBN 288508 KTracy@PaladinLaw.com Kirk M. Tracy PALADIN LAW GROUP® LLP 1176 Boulevard Way Walnut Creek, CA 94595 Telephone: (925) 947-5700 Facsimile: (925) 935-8488 Counsel for Estate of Robert Renzel, Deceased, by and through his successors in interest, Susan Carter and Ann Renzel Sebastian; Robert E. Renzel Trust, by and through its trustees, Susan Carter and Ann Renzel Sebastian; Susan Carter; Ann Renzel Sebastian; and Bascom Avenue Development LLC 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 OAKLAND DIVISION 12 13 ESTATE OF ROBERT RENZEL, DECEASED et al., 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 17 18 19 20 Case No. 4:15-cv-1648-HSG NOTICE AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. PROC. 41(a)(2) OF RENZEL AND TORRES AND ORDER ESTATE OF LUPE VENTURA, DECEASED, et al., Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS AND CROSSCLAIM. 21 22 23 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), Plaintiffs and 24 Counter-Defendants Estate of Robert Renzel, Deceased, by and through his successors in interest, 25 Susan Carter and Ann Renzel Sebastian; Robert E. Renzel Trust, by and through its trustees, Susan 26 Carter and Ann Renzel Sebastian; Susan Carter; Ann Renzel Sebastian; and Bascom Avenue 27 Development LLC, a California limited liability company (collectively, “Renzel”), and Defendants, 28 Counter-Claimants, and Cross-Claimants Carmen Torres and Alfredo Torres (collectively, RENZEL AND TORRES NOTICE AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL 1 “Torres”) hereby request an order that dismisses all claims between Renzel and Torres in this 2 action. 3 On July 17, 2019, the Court granted Renzel and Torres’ joint application for determination 4 of good faith settlement and establishment of the Bascom Remediation Trust. ECF No. 321. All 5 required settlement payments have been received by Renzel. Pursuant to the terms of the underlying 6 settlement agreement, Renzel and Torres submit this request for dismissal. Renzel and Torres are 7 separately submitting notices of voluntary dismissal or requests for dismissal of all other remaining 8 parties. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Accordingly, Renzel and Torres agree to and request an order: 1. Dismissing each of Renzel’s claims against Torres from its Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 67), with prejudice; 2. Dismissing each of Torres’s counterclaims against Renzel from its First Amended Counterclaims (ECF No. 44), with prejudice; 3. Providing that Renzel and Torres shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs. Respectfully submitted, DATED: August 23, 2019 17 /s/ Bret A. Stone 18 19 Counsel for Renzel DATED: August 23, 2019 20 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP /s/ Glenn A. Friedman 21 Counsel for Counter Defendants Ann Renzel Sebastian, Susan Carter and the Estate of Robert Renzel 22 23 24 PALADIN LAW GROUP® LLP DATED: August 23, 2019 CAUFIELD & JAMES LLP 25 /s/ Jeffery L. Caufield 26 Counsel for Alfredo and Carmen Torres 27 28 -2Case No. 4:15-cv-1648-HSG RENZEL AND TORRES NOTICE AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ORDER Good cause appearing, the Court orders as follows: 1. Each of Renzel’s claims against Torres from its Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 67) are hereby dismissed with prejudice; 2. Each of Torres’s counterclaims against Renzel from its First Amended Counterclaims (ECF No. 44) are hereby dismissed with prejudice; 3. Renzel and Torres shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs. 8 9 Dated: 8/23/2019 United United States District Judge t 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3Case No. 4:15-cv-1648-HSG RENZEL AND TORRES NOTICE AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?