Heldt v. Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd

Filing 359

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 349 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 331 MOTION to Compel Arbitration of Certain Class Members' Claims. Responses due by 6/19/2018. Replies due by 7/3/2018. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 8 9 10 Case No. 4:15-cv-01696-YGR (SK) BRIAN BUCHANAN, ET AL., 11 12 13 CLASS ACTION Plaintiffs, v. TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES, LTD., 14 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION Defendant. 15 RE: Dkt. No.: 349 16 17 Having considered Plaintiffs’ Motion for a one-week Extension of Time to file responses in 18 opposition to Defendant Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd.’s Motions to Compel Arbitration (Dkt. 19 #331), the Court finds that good cause exists to grant the requested relief. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s 20 motion is hereby GRANTED, and the deadline for Plaintiffs to file their response to Defendant’s 21 Motion to Compel Arbitration is extended from June 12, 2018 to June 19, 2018. Additionally, the 22 deadline for Defendant to file its reply in support of its Motion is extended from June 16, 2018 to 23 July 3, 2018. 24 This Order terminates Docket Number 349. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 DATED: June __, 2018 8 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 28 1 ORDER GRANTING PLS.’ MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME NO. 4:15-CV-01696-YGR (SK)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?