Heldt v. Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd

Filing 586

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 496 Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

8
9
10
11

Case No. 4:15-cv-01696-YGR (SK)
CHRISTOPHER SLAIGHT, et al.,
CLASS ACTION

12
13
14
15

Plaintiffs,
v.
TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES, LTD.,
Defendant.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER
SEAL
Complaint Filed: April 14, 2015

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLS.’ ADMIN. MOT. TO SEAL

No. 4:15-cv-01696-YGR (SK)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

1
2

Having considered Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, the Court finds that

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

good cause does not exist to seal the materials at issue.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Administrative Motion to File Under Seal is DENIED.
Accordingly, the following documents may not be filed under seal:
Document or Portion of
Document Sought to be
Sealed
Plaintiffs’ Motion to
Permit Contemporaneous
Testimony From A
Remote Location Under
Rule 43(a):
 4:19-5:8
 Footnotes 6, 7, 9, 11

Evidence Offered in Support
of Sealing

Order

None - Designated Confidential
by Defendant Tata Consultancy
Services, Ltd., which has not
filed a supporting declaration as
required by L.R. 79-5(e)(1).

DENIED.

Exhibit 5: Entire
document

None - Designated Confidential
by Defendant Tata Consultancy
Services, Ltd., which has not
filed a supporting declaration as
required by L.R. 79-5(e)(1).
None - Designated Confidential
by Defendant Tata Consultancy
Services, Ltd., which has not
filed a supporting declaration as
required by L.R. 79-5(e)(1).
None - Designated Confidential
by Defendant Tata Consultancy
Services, Ltd., which has not
filed a supporting declaration as
required by L.R. 79-5(e)(1).
None - Designated Confidential
by Defendant Tata Consultancy
Services, Ltd., which has not
filed a supporting declaration as
required by L.R. 79-5(e)(1).
None - Designated Confidential
by Defendant Tata Consultancy
Services, Ltd., which has not
filed a supporting declaration as
required by L.R. 79-5(e)(1).

DENIED.

13
14
15
16
17

Exhibit 6: Entire
document

18
19
20

Exhibit 7: Entire
document

21
22
23

Exhibit 8: Entire
document

24
25
26
27

Exhibit 9: Entire
document

DENIED.

DENIED.

DENIED.

DENIED.

28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLS.’ ADMIN. MOT. TO SEAL

No. 4:15-cv-01696-YGR (SK)

1

Exhibit 10: Entire
document

2
3
4

Exhibit 11: Entire
document

5
6
7

Exhibit 12: Entire
document

8
9
10

Exhibit 13: Entire
document

11
12

None - Designated Confidential
by Defendant Tata Consultancy
Services, Ltd., which has not
filed a supporting declaration as
required by L.R. 79-5(e)(1).
None - Designated Confidential
by Defendant Tata Consultancy
Services, Ltd., which has not
filed a supporting declaration as
required by L.R. 79-5(e)(1).
None - Designated Confidential
by Defendant Tata Consultancy
Services, Ltd., which has not
filed a supporting declaration as
required by L.R. 79-5(e)(1).
None - Designated Confidential
by Defendant Tata Consultancy
Services, Ltd., which has not
filed a supporting declaration as
required by L.R. 79-5(e)(1).

DENIED.

DENIED.

DENIED.

DENIED.

13
The Order terminates Docket Number 496.
14
15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 11, 2018

__________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLS.’ ADMIN. MOT. TO SEAL

No. 4:15-cv-01696-YGR (SK)