Dillett v. Schram et al

Filing 30

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 29 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Dismissal filed by Ann C Dillett, Frederick K. Schram, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 6/21/16. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 CHARLES D. COCHRAN, Esq. [State Bar No. 98064] KORNBLUM, COCHRAN, ERICKSON & HARBISON, LLP 50 Old Courthouse Square, Suite 601 Santa Rosa, CA 95404 (707) 544-9006 - Telephone (707) 544-7213 - Facsimile 4 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff ANN DILLETT 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANN DILLETT, Individually as the personal representative of FRED C. DILLETT, Case No.: C 15-01697 KAW 12 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER THEREON Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 FRED K. SCHRAM, et al., Honorable: Kandis A. Westmore 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective 18 counsel and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) that this entire action is hereby 19 dismissed with prejudice. Each party to pay its own costs and attorney fees. 20 SO AGREED BY: 21 22 Dated: June 20, 2016 __/s/_____________________________________ Counsel for Plaintiff ANN DILLETT Dated: June 20, 2016 __/s/_____________________________________ Counsel for Defendant FREDERICK K SCHRAM, Individually and as Trustee of the Up River Family Trust, under Agreement dated 3/15/95 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 1 2 3 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed, with prejudice, and each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs. June 21st IT IS SO ORDERED this _______ day of _________________, 2016. 4 5 6 ____________________________________ Hon. Judge. Kandis A. Westmore 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?