Mershon v. Colvin

Filing 8

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO INFORM COURT REGARDING CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 6/1/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

PAMELA JOYCE MERSHON,
Plaintiff,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

No. C 15-01840 JSW

v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of
Social Security,

13
Defendant.
14

/

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF
TO INFORM COURT
REGARDING CONSENT TO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL
PURPOSES

15
16

In cases initially assigned to a district judge, the parties may consent at any time to

17

reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including entry of final

18

judgment. See Civil L.R. 73-1(b). The Court has received notice of such consent from

19

Defendant. Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby DIRECTED to advise the Court, no later than June

20

15, 2015, as to whether she consents to have a magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings

21

in the instant action. For the parties’ convenience, consent forms are available at

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

1

http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, in the “Forms” section.1 The parties are further advised that they

2

may jointly request assignment to a specific magistrate judge.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

Dated: June 1, 2015
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
Normally, the Court would direct the parties to so inform the Court in their joint
case management statement filed in connection with a case management conference.
Because the instant action involves a review of an administrative record, however, a case
management conference has not been scheduled.

2