Blackman-Baham v. Jewell

Filing 35

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSE TO 33 MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE LATE OPPOSITION. Opposition is due 8/11/2016. No reply in support of the motion for permission shall be filed. In its order ruling on the motion for permission to file a late opposition, the Court shall set a further schedule, as appropriate at that time. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/8/2016. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES D
D
DISTRICT C
COURT

5

NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI
RN
CT
IFORNIA

6
7

SH
HEILA BLA
ACKMAN-B
BAHAM,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 1
15-cv-01922
2-JSW

v.
SA
ALLY JEWE
ELL,
Defendant.
.

ORDER S
SETTING SCHEDULE FOR
E
RESPONS TO MOT
SE
TION FOR
R
PERMISS
SION TO FI
ILE LATE
OPPOSIT
TION
Re: Dkt. N 33
No.

12
13

The Co has recei
ourt
ived Plaintif motion f permissio to file a la oppositio to the
ff’s
for
on
ate
on

14

mo
otion to dism (Dkt. No 33), accom
miss
o.
mpanied by t proposed late opposi
the
d
ition (Dkt. N 34). The
No.

15

Court STRIKE the schedu for respo
ES
ule
onse to the m
motion for pe
ermission tha was autom
at
matically

16

gen
nerated by th Court’s el
he
lectronic filing system an entered a part of doc entry 33 and SETS
nd
as
cket
3,
S

17

the following schedule.
e
s

18

The opp
position to th motion fo permission to file a la opposition is due on A
he
or
n
ate
n
August 11,

19

201 No reply in support of the motio for permi ssion shall b filed. See generally N Cal.
16.
y
on
be
e
N.D.

20

Civ L.R. 7-11.
vil.

21
22
23
24

In its or
rder ruling on the motion for permission to file a late opposi
o
n
ition, the Co shall set
ourt
a fu
urther sched
dule, as appro
opriate at tha time.
at
IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: August 8, 2016

25
26
27
28

JE
EFFREY S. W
WHITE
Un
nited States D
District Judg
ge