Electrical Industry Service Bureau, Inc., et al v. J Copello International Corp. d/b/a Copello Electric Co.

Filing 23

ORDER GRANTING 22 STIPULATION to Continue Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/14/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2015)

Case4:15-cv-01946-JSW Document22 Filed09/11/15 Page1 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6

Benjamin K. Lunch, State Bar No. 246015
Wan Yan Ling, State Bar No. 297029
NEYHART, ANDERSON, FLYNN & GROSBOLL
369 Pine Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel. [phone]
Fax [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

10

Patricia Walsh, State Bar No. 121098
LEONIDOU & ROSIN
777 Cuesta Drive, Suite 200
Mountain View, CA 94040
Tel. [phone]
Fax [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

11

Attorneys for Defendants

7
8
9

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14

(Oakland Division)

15
16
17

ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY SERVICE
BUREAU, INC., et al.

18
19
20

Case No. 15-CV-1946-JSW
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE

Plaintiffs,
v.
J COPELLLO INTERNATIONAL CORP.
d/b/a COPELLO ELECTRIC CO.

21

Defendant.
22

______________________________________

23
24
25
26
27
NEYHART, 28
ANDERSON,
FLYNN &
GROSBOLL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

-1STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 15-CV-1946-JSW

Case4:15-cv-01946-JSW Document22 Filed09/11/15 Page2 of 4

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE

1
2

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

3

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, the parties through undersigned counsel hereby

4

stipulate and respectfully request that the Court continue the Initial Case Management

5

Conference scheduled for September 18, 2015 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland

6

Courthouse. The parties declare in support of this request:
7

WHEREAS, on April 29, 2015, Plaintiffs filed this Complaint against Defendant (Dckt.
8
9
10

No. 1);
WHEREAS, on June 2, 2015, a copy of the Summons and Complaint was served on

11

Defendant, as evidenced by the Proof of Service of Summons and Complaint filed with this

12

Court (Dckt. No. 12);

13

WHEREAS, service having been completed and the answer period having elapsed without

14

an answer or other responsive pleading filed with the Court, Plaintiffs requested that the Court
15
16

enter default on July 6, 2015 (Dckt. No. 13);

17

WHEREAS, on July 7, 2015, default was entered against Defendant (Dckt. No. 14);

18

WHEREAS, on July 23, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a Case Management Statement advising the

19
20
21

Court of Plaintiffs’ intent to file a Motion for Default Judgment (Dckt. No. 15);
WHEREAS, on July 27, 2015, the Court issued an Order Continuing the Initial Case
Management Conference to September 18, 2015 (Dckt. No. 16);

22

WHEREAS, on August 20, 2015, Defendant filed a Motion to Set Aside Default (Dckt.
23
24
25
26

No. 17);
WHEREAS, on September 1, 2015, Plaintiffs filed an Opposition to Defendant’s Motion
to Set Aside Default (Dckt. No. 19);

27
NEYHART, 28
ANDERSON,
FLYNN &
GROSBOLL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

-2STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 15-CV-1946-JSW

Case4:15-cv-01946-JSW Document22 Filed09/11/15 Page3 of 4

1
2

WHEREAS, on September 10, 2015, Defendant filed a Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to
Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Default (Dckt. No. 20);

3

WHEREAS, the Motion Hearing is set for October 2, 2015 at 9:00 AM (Dckt. No. 18);

4

WHEREAS, in light of the pending Motion Hearing, both parties believe it would be

5

premature for the Initial Case Management Conference to be held on September 18, 2015;

6

THEREFORE, pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, the parties though their respective
7

attorneys stipulate as follows:
8
9

The parties respectfully request that the Court continue the Initial Case Management

10

Conference till after the Motion Hearing has been held on October 2, 2015, and the Court has

11

made a decision on said Motion.

12
13

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

14

Dated: September 10, 2015

By: /s/ Wan Yan Ling
WAN YAN LING
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Neyhart, Anderson, Flynn & Grosboll

Dated: September 11, 2015

By: /s/ Patricia Walsh
PATRICIA WALSH
Attorney for Defendant
Leonidou & Rosin

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
The case management conference is continued pending the court's ruling on the motion to set aside
default and shall be re-set, as necessary, upon disposition of that motion.
Dated: September 14, 2015

_______________________
Hon. Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge

25
26
27
NEYHART, 28
ANDERSON,
FLYNN &
GROSBOLL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

-3STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 15-CV-1946-JSW