Anaya v. Pandell et al

Filing 10

ORDER re 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply filed by Jane C. Pandell. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 06/05/2015. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

EDWARD M. ANAYA,

Case No. 15-cv-02012-DMR

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

9
10

JANE C. PANDELL, et al.,

Re: Dkt. No. 9

Defendants.
12

The court has reviewed Defendant Jane Curran Pandell’s motion for an extension of time

13

to respond to Plaintiff Edward M. Anaya’s complaint and request to shorten time on the motion.

14

[Docket No. 9.] The court will treat Defendant’s motion as a motion for administrative relief

15

pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11. Any opposition by Plaintiff is due by no later than 5:00

16

p.m. on June 5, 2015. Defendant’s request to shorten time on the motion is denied as moot. The

17

court will rule on the motion on June 8, 2015, in conformance with the local rules.

18

26
27
28

S

ER

M. Ryu

R NIA

onna
Judge D

H

25

RT

24

NO

23

FO

22

RED

E
______________________________________
O ORD
IT IS S
Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge

LI

21

Dated: June 5, 2015

A

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RT
U
O

19

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

UNIT
ED

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C