Anaya v. Pandell et al

Filing 18

ORDER Regarding the Parties' Notice of Pending Settlement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 07/30/2015. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2015)

1
2
3

Edward M. Anaya (State Bar No. 233354)
Anaya Law
1559-B Sloat Blvd, #170
San Francisco, CA 94132-1222
Telephone: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Plaintiff
—and—
Robert M. Pattison (State Bar No. 103528)
JACKSON LEWIS P.C.
50 California Street, 9th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4615
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

14

Charles F. Seemann III, Of Counsel
JACKSON LEWIS, P.C.
650 Poydras Street, Suite 1900
New Orleans, Louisiana 70130
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

15

Attorneys for Defendants

12
13

16
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19
20

EDWARD M. ANAYA, an individual,

21

Plaintiff,

22
23
24

Case No. 4:15-cv-02012-DMR
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
THE PARTIES’ NOTICE OF PENDING
SETTLEMENT AS MODIFIED

vs.

Ctrm.:
Judge:

PANDELL LAW FIRM, INC. PROFIT
SHARING PLAN; ALEXANDER J.
PANDELL; JANE CURRAN PANDELL; and
DOES 1 – 50,

25
26

4 – 3rd Fl.
Donna M. Ryu,
Magistrate Judge

Complaint Filed:

5/1/2015

Defendant.

27
28
1
[Proposed] Order Regarding the
Parties’ Notice of Pending Settlement

Case No. 4:15-cv-02012-DMR

1

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

2

The Court, having reviewed all papers related to the parties’ “Joint Notice of Pending

3

Settlement and Stipulation of Dismissal as to Individual Defendants,” hereby approves the Notice

4

and Stipulation as follows:

8
9
10
11
12
13

2.

Plaintiff’s right to re-assert claims against the Individual Defendants is reserved,

pending formal settlement.
3.

The parties shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to submit a

formal pleading that dismisses the action pursuant to settlement, or in the event settlement is not
The court withdraws its 7/29/15 order to provide a status report by
finalized, advising the Court of same. 8/12/15.
4.

All dates and deadlines applicable to the above-captioned action are suspended

pending further order of the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

15
16

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

14

“Individual Defendants”) are dismissed without prejudice; and

DERED
SO OR
____________________________________
IT IS

July 30, 2015
DATE: ______________________

R NIA

7

Defendants, Jane Curran Pandell and Alexander J. Pandell (collectively,

S

6

1.

UNIT
ED

5

ER

A

H

4843-3392-6694, v. 1

LI

RT

19
20

. Ryu

onna M
Judge D

NO

18

FO

Donna M. Ryu, U.S. Magistrate Judge

17

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[Proposed] Order Regarding the
Parties’ Notice of Pending Settlement

Case No. 4:15-cv-02012-DMR