Anderson et al v. SeaWorld Parks and Entertainment

Filing 283

ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting 247 , 248 , 250 , 268 , 273 Administrative Motions to File Under Seal. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARC ANDERSON, et al., Plaintiffs, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 15-cv-02172-JSW (JCS) v. SEAWORLD PARKS AND ENTERTAINMENT, INC., ORDER REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL Re: Dkt. Nos. 247, 248, 250, 268, 273 Defendant. 12 13 14 15 For the reasons stated in the parties’ briefs and declarations, the administrative motions filed as docket entries 247, 248, 250, 268, and 273 are GRANTED. This order is based on the “good cause” standard applicable to confidential discovery 16 documents attached to nondispositive motions only tangentially related to the merits of the case, 17 and should not be taken as a conclusion that “compelling reasons” would justify sealing these 18 documents in a different context. See Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 19 1101–02 (9th Cir. 2016). 20 Going forward, the parties are reminded that unredacted versions of documents sought to 21 be filed partially under seal must include highlighting to indicate the portions proposed to be 22 redacted, a requirement that the parties satisfied with respect to some but not all of the documents 23 at issue. See Civ. L.R. 79-5(d)(1)(D). 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: February 6, 2019 ______________________________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO Chief Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?