Adobe Systems Incorporated v. A & S Electronics, Inc. et al

Filing 94

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY LETTER: Re 92 Proposed Order, filed by Adobe Systems Incorporated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 7/12/2016. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
OAKLAND COURTHOUSE

10
11
12

ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, a
Delaware Corporation,

13

Plaintiff,

14

v.

15
16
17

Case No.: 4:15-cv-02288-SBA (EDL)
[PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING DISCOVERY LETTERS
Re: Dkt. Nos. 82, 83, 84

A & S ELECTRONICS, INC., a California
Corporation d/b/a TRUSTPRICE; ALAN Z.
LIN, an Individual; and DOES 1-10, Inclusive,
Defendants.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24

[PROPOSED] ORDER
On July, 8, 2016, at 10:00AM, via teleconference and pursuant to the Court’s Order (ECF
Dkt. 84), Plaintiff Adobe Systems Incorporated (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants A&S Electronics,
Inc., and Alan Z. Lin (“Defendants”) came before the Court regarding Defendants’ Discovery
Letter (ECF Dkt. 82) seeking to quash Plaintiff’s June 10, 2016 subpoena duces tecum to Bank
of America, National Association (“Bank of America”), and regarding Plaintiff’s Discovery

25
Letter in response thereto (ECF Dkt. 83).
26
Having considered the letters filed, and the arguments of counsel presented at the July 8,
27
2016 hearing, the Court Orders as follows:
28
1. Plaintiff shall serve Bank of America with the Amended Subpoena in the form
-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER – Case No.: 4:15-cv-02288 SBA (EDL)

1

attached hereto as Exhibit A, which has been limited to only financial documents and

2

records in the calendar year 2014.

3

2. Bank of America shall comply without delay by producing the documents identified

4

in the Amended Subpoena. Bank of America shall produce requested documents

5

directly to Plaintiff’s counsel, as instructed in the Amended Subpoena.

6

3. In the event Plaintiff determines that the 2014 documents produced by Bank of

7

America are insufficient, the parties shall meet and confer regarding what further

8

records from Bank of America are to be provided pursuant to an additional subpoena

9

to Bank of America, and a subsequent subpoena shall be issued to Bank of America

10

in accordance with any meet and confer agreement of the parties. If the parties are

11

unable to come an agreement regarding what further documents should be produced

12

by Bank of America, the parties shall timely file a joint discovery letter with the

13

Court regarding the dispute, if any.

14
15

July
12th
IT IS SO ORDERED this ______ day of _____________, 2016.

16
17
18
19

_________________________________
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge
Northern District of California

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

[PROPOSED] ORDER – Case No.: 4:15-cv-02288 SBA (EDL)