Hives vs. County of Alameda

Filing 52

ORDER (As Modified) by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 50 Stipulation modifying Case Management Deadlines. Motions terminated: 48 Stipulation with Proposed Order. Case Management Statement due by 6/22/2016. Further Case Management Conference set for 6/29/2016 01:30 PM. Discovery due by 6/30/2016. Experts Discovery cut-off by 7/28/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 4/22/16. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 TIMOTHY P. MURPHY, ESQ. {Bar No. 120920) EDRINGTON, SCHIRMER & MURPHY LLP 2300 Contra Costa Boulevard, Suite 450 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523-3936 Telephone: (925) 827-3300 Facsimile: (925) 827-3320 Email: TMurphy@esinlawfirm.com Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF ALAMEDA and DEREK THOMS 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH 10 11 12 PATRICIA HIVES, individually and as cosuccessor in interest to Decedent Jacori Calhoun, 13 Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 16 CASE NO.: 4:15-cv-02490-DMR STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES (AS MODIFIED) COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, municipal corporation; DEREK THOMS, individually and in his official capacity as deputy for the COUNTY OF ALAMEDA et al., 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 M.C., by and through his guardian ad litem, ARION'GUILLORY Plaintiff, vs. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, municipal corporation; DEREK THOMS, individually and in his official capacity as deputy for the COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Sheriff s Department; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, individually and in their official capacities as deputies for the COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Sheriff's Department, jointly and severally, Defendants. 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES (AS MODIFIED) CASE NO.: 4:15-cv-02490-DMR 1 2 WHEREAS the parties have diligently been cooperating and working on completing discovery including depositions of the parties. 3 4 WHEREAS, calendar conflicts necessitated a postponement of the Settlement Conference before the Hon. Magistrate Maria-Elena James to June 7, 2016. 5 WHEREAS the parties have agreed and stipulated to modify the Case Management 6 deadlines contained in the Case Management and Pretrial Order for Jury Trial filed on September 7 3, 2015 (Document 1#24). The current trial date of October 17, 2016 is not affected. 8 9 Pursuant to local rule 6-1 and 6-2 the parties stipulate and propose the following modifications to the Case Management deadlines: 10 11 EVENT 12 Last day file joint case management 5/25/2016 13 statement 14 Case Management Conference 15 All non-expert discovery shall be 5/31/2016 16 completed by 17 Experts shall 18 reports provided by 19 Rebuttal experts shall be disclosed 6/14/2016 20 and reports provided by 21 All discovery from experts shall be 6/28/2016 22 completed by CURRENT DATE 6/1/2016 at 1:30 p.m. be disclosed and 5/31/2016 PROPOSED DATE 6/15/2016 6/22/2016 6/29/2016 6/22/2016 at 1:30 p.m. 6/30/2016 6/30/2016 7/14/2016 7/28/2016 23 24 /// 25 /// 26 Ill 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES (AS MODIFIED) CASE NO.: 4:15-cv-02490-DMR It is so stipulated. DATED: April 19, 2016 THE LAW OFFICES OF JO BURRIS 1111 By /s/ DEWITTT M. LACY, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs, PATRICIA HIVES, individually and as cosuccessor in interest to Decedent Jacori Calhoun and M.C., by and through is guardian ad 'item, ARION GUILLORY DATED: April 19, 2016 EDRINGTON, SCHIR HY LP By Is/ TIMOTHY P URPHY, Esq. Attorney fo Defendants COUNT OF ALAMEDA d DEREK THOMS ORDER AS MODIFIED ERED O ORD D IT IS S DIFIE AS MO R NIA By UNIT ED DATED: April 22, 2016 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S Good cause appearing, it is so ordered. RT A H ER M. Ryu LI NO onna Judge D FO MAGISTRATE JUDGE DONNA M. RYU N F D IS T IC T O R C 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES (AS MODIFIED) CASE NO.: 4 :15-cv-02490-DMR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?