Aston et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Filing 27

ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED STIPULATION SELECTING ADR PROCESS. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 9/15/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2015)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JUSTIN ASTON, and STEVEN DE BORBA, et al. Plaintiff(s), V. UNITED PARCEL SERCVICE, INC., et al. Defendant(s). CASE NO. 15-cv-02497-JSW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS AS MODIFIED Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neub:al Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) � Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) D D (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form ofADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. Th ey must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) �ivate Process: LJ Private ADR (please identify process and provider) --------- The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) D D other requested deadline ------------------- Dated: 9/03/15 Dated: 9/03/15 CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE [PROPOSED] ORDER D D x The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. During the case management conference before the Court, the parties agreed to private mediation to be completed by no later than May 31, 2016. Dated: September 15, 2015 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATEJUDGE DISTRICT JUDGE When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation." Rev. 12/11 Page 2 of2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?