Luque v. City of Richmond et al
Filing
22
ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/22/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
HUMBERTO SEPULVEDA LUQUE,
Case No. 15-cv-02625-JSW
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND
PRETRIAL MATTERS
9
10
CITY OF RICHMOND, et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case
14
Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further
15
ORDERED that:
16
A.
DATES
17
Jury Trial Date: Monday, September 19, 2016, at 8:00 a.m., 10 days
18
Jury Selection: September 14, 2016, at 8:00 a.m.
19
Pretrial Conference: Monday, August 29, 2016, at 2:00 p.m.
20
Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: Friday, June 24, 2016, 9:00 A.M.
21
Last Day for Expert Discovery: May 6, 2026
22
Last Day for Expert Disclosure: April 22, 2016
23
Close of Non-expert Discovery: March 25, 2016
24
B.
DISCOVERY
25
The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to
26
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses
27
pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of non-
28
expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all
1
supplementation has been completed.
2
C.
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
3
This matter is referred for assignment to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero to conduct a
4
settlement conference to be completed by December 18, 2015. Counsel will be contacted by that
5
judge's chambers with a date and time for the conference.
6
D.
PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER
7
No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its
8
own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b)
9
without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline
10
contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties may
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the date of
12
this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to a change
13
in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule that the Court
14
will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are specifically set
15
by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain leave of Court.
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
Dated: September 22, 2015
19
20
21
______________________________________
JEFFREY S. WHITE
United States District Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?