Baldwin et al v. Colley et al

Filing 34

ORDER re 33 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Parties to file required declaration within 7 days. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 03/15/2016. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MALAD BALDWIN, et al., Case No. 15-cv-02762-KAW Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 9 10 JAMES COLLEY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 33 Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 On March 8, 2016, the parties filed a proposed stipulated protective order. They did not, 14 however, indicate whether they were using a model protective order or a modified protective order 15 as required by the Court’s Standing Order. (See Judge Westmore’s General Standing Order ¶ 11.) 16 Accordingly, the parties are ordered to submit, within 7 days of this order, (a) a declaration 17 stating that the proposed order is identical to one of the model orders, (b) a declaration explaining 18 each modification to the model order, along with a redline version comparing the proposed 19 protective order with the model order, available at 20 protective-orders, or (c) a declaration explaining why use of one of the model orders is not 21 practicable. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 03/15/16 __________________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?