Baldwin et al v. Colley et al

Filing 34

ORDER re 33 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Parties to file required declaration within 7 days. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 03/15/2016. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

MALAD BALDWIN, et al.,

Case No. 15-cv-02762-KAW

Plaintiffs,
8
v.

ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER

9
10

JAMES COLLEY, et al.,

Re: Dkt. No. 33

Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

On March 8, 2016, the parties filed a proposed stipulated protective order. They did not,

14

however, indicate whether they were using a model protective order or a modified protective order

15

as required by the Court’s Standing Order. (See Judge Westmore’s General Standing Order ¶ 11.)

16

Accordingly, the parties are ordered to submit, within 7 days of this order, (a) a declaration

17

stating that the proposed order is identical to one of the model orders, (b) a declaration explaining

18

each modification to the model order, along with a redline version comparing the proposed

19

protective order with the model order, available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/model-

20

protective-orders, or (c) a declaration explaining why use of one of the model orders is not

21

practicable.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 03/15/16
__________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge